Thread: Debunking The "End Of Days." (2012)

Alextanium and Omnius Deus I just want to say thank you for your contributions. Every time a post of this nature is made we look better and better. Simply because of the vast and generalized inaccurate statements against us which borders on unjustified ridicule.

While it tends to make you look worse unfortunately, that is not overall what is important to us. Nothing personal but rather the ignorance becomes the problem to face, together with getting the information out there. Exposing that ignorance is what we need so it's nothing personal.

Thank you in particular for saying such outlandish things as you don't consider anything I have posted as critical thinking. Or that we are a waste of life or bullies ['internet tough guys']. And anything else mindlessly stated about either me or someone else that was obviously insensitive and juvenile.

This isn't to say you are not capable of more than this. But these sorts of regressive negative assumptions aimed with whatever it is, a general hatred or a misunderstanding. Only cause a further momentum forward for our cause of awareness and civil conduct. Let the truth speak for itself and that is exactly what is happening as it is our fundamental intention. So let the best intention win. Anything else would be 'getting your conspiracies crossed'.

The proper thing to do is name which conspiracies are crossed impersonally and why. The improper approach is to pin a vague statement of incompetence on a group of people personally. Without giving any details or reason for stating why that is the case. That becomes the useless thing.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Alextanium and Omnius Deus I just want to say thank you for your contributions. Every time a post of this nature is made we look better and better.

I'm watching these threads, and I don't think it makes you look better. In fact it tends to make more sense than what you're saying
:[


^____^

Omicron then you are in the same boat as them Since you didn't give a reason. Your response to my inquiry in pm has yielded this which is obviously not satisfactory.

Originally Posted by Omicron

You make less sense because what you're saying makes less sense. You make less sense completely independently of me watching you do it. It doesn't make sense to ask me for a reason that you don't make sense. It isn't about me.

That is why I said responses like this have a tendency to make us look better due to the lack of justification. You seem to be grasping at straws here to come up with a realistic reason to disregard people's credibility. Desire of will is not enough it must make sense why you think someone lacks credibility. If it isn't logical it becomes a fictional part of your imagination. Ofcourse it isn't about us it is about authority of the truth. Your reasoning doesn't cut it when it is based on nothing more than your subjective desire to exercise a right of imagination and claim that as evidence.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

Omicron then you are in the same boat as them Since you didn't give a reason.

Why should I need to give a reason that you don't make sense? It's like if I watched you say "elephants enjoy faces because me" and I say you don't make sense. I don't need to give you a reason, you just don't make sense.

Originally Posted by Omicron

I watched you say "elephants enjoy faces because me" and I say you don't make sense.

The problem is I didn't say that you made it up. It becomes self evident 'me' is not a reason. Funnily enough that was the excuse you gave to dismiss the info. That is why I said you have no real justification.

Play word games if you want. Go ahead and did a deeper grave. We can create another better saint.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

The problem is I didn't say that you made it up. It becomes self evident 'me' is not a reason. Funnily enough that was the excuse you gave to dismiss the info. That is why I said you have no real justification.

Play word games if you want. Go ahead and did a deeper grave. We can create another better saint.

He stated an opinion about you, and that's "you make no sense." He comes to that conclusion from reading what you type, and that's his reason for believing that you make no sense.

Originally Posted by nitsuJ

He stated an opinion about you, and that's "you make no sense." He comes to that conclusion from reading what you type, and that's his reason for believing that you make no sense.

That's coming to a conclusion based on your conclusion. What I type...You are yet to define it. So you can't have a conclusion until you define what didn't make sense. 'What I typed' is not a reason for why it doesn't make sense.

How you manage to avoid such a basic common sense thing is amazing. Especially when you are saying at the same time I am without sense. I assume you are now his representative and clarifying for me, what he thinks. So I'll assume you have the same opinion with the same unique invalid reasoning if you're not a multiple account.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

That's coming to a conclusion based on your conclusion. What I type...You are yet to define it. So you can't have a conclusion until you define what didn't make sense. 'What I typed' is not a reason for why it doesn't make sense.

How you manage to avoid such a basic common sense thing is amazing. Especially when you are saying at the same time I am without sense. I assume you are now his representative and clarifying for me, what he thinks. So I'll assume you have the same opinion with the unique same invalid reasoning if you're not a multiple account.

No, it's an observation. Some of your statements don't make sense at all.

If it's an observation it's a poor one. You're going around in circles. I don't think you understand the problem here. I may as well say you don't make sense because of what you posted. Yet it doesn't get us anywhere different. It's easy to say 'you don't make sense' but it doesn't mean anything if that statement is by itself it has nothing to support itself with. School should have made you realize.

They will believe it when the illusion finally crashes on top of their head though. That day is more near than you think. The stock market is not something that is genuine or real it's always being something fraudulent. It's always being a tool of manipulation economically.

Once again I wouldn't quote me if I'm online. By the time you do my post will have changed.

Originally Posted by Minervas Phoenix

...vast and generalized inaccurate statements against us...

While it tends to make you look worse unfortunately, that is not overall what is important to us. Nothing personal but rather the ignorance becomes the problem to face, together with getting the information out there. Exposing that ignorance is what we need so it's nothing personal.

I agree that there are vast and generalized inaccurate statements against people, I just want to thank you for helping point such things out, and for providing the information for people who wish to come to their own conclusions about things.

Seriously, since I have became a member of this site, I have grown in so many ways, and I would definitely consider myself a better person. Most of it is because of posts like yours and others like you.

I happen to be interested in the possibilities in store for us in the future, while none of them are certain, it can't hurt to consider them. Obviously not everyone has the same interests, and people often say I'm weird, so it doesn't bother me when people don't share similar interests. Just because something has been "debunked" doesn't mean anything to me. There is so much fake debunking going on in the world today (at least enough in the US to go around) that it is hard to believe the debunking. People can debunk all they want, but all they are doing is giving their opinions. I do listen to them, but more often than not, I disagree with what is said. I don't believe anything I don't agree with.

I also want to say, Minervas Phoenix, you rarely if ever do not make sense to me.