|
|
The cure and prevention for cancer and many other health issues is here. Why can't we use it? Plants can't be patented, there is no money to be made. |
|
|
|
Yeah, word to that xei. People seem to think that the corruption and greediness of man let cancer cures and things like that (such as things that produce massive amounts of cheap energy, food, etc.) be concealed and suppressed. If anything, though, this selfishness would make people want to advertise their findings. Imagine being the person who found the cure to cancer. Do you think that he would go and sell his silence to some evil drug corporation? Personally, I'd imagine he would rather (or at least I would) get infinite and eternal fame and respect for doing this, not to mention you'd obviously get money for it as well. It's just so silly, all of that. The same thing applies to everything. For example, say someone found out how to make water powered, zero emissions cars. As much money as you would get from oil companies for your silence, you would get exponentially more for creating a company that makes cars that run off water (I'd imagine virtually EVERYONE would buy such a car). Lets stop with the nonsense. |
|
Im kind of burned out on watching vids cause I just watched that Obama deception vid...so I just wanted to know before I watch this...are these plants PROVEN to at least recduce cancer by actually tests? |
|
A warrior does not give up what he loves, he finds the love in what he does
Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible.
I 100% believe there are natural cures for anything. You must find the source of the problem and get rid of the root, and all the other branches of sickness will dissapear. You'd be surprised at how much the FTC and FDA "Don't Know About." |
|
Well, plant and herbs can by law not be patented, so medicine corporations will not produce and manufacture it as buyable medicine. |
|
In theory, wouldn't the cancer cells adapt to any "cure", and become a new strain? |
|
|
|
THC has been know to kill cancer since 1974. Yes, many studies have been done. |
|
Obviously you did not watch the documentary and know nothing about the pharmacological industry... |
|
Yeah, that would work...... |
|
Last edited by plg6067; 04-10-2009 at 03:08 AM.
Chill out. You're unlikely to get any more thoughtful answers if you continue to berate people who contribute. |
|
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but...I doubt you're that naive Xei. I'd bet my house that the newspapers would print your obituary faster than news of your cure (should you discover one). Do you NOT know that big companies are malicious and don't give a damn about you? Why do you think Ford wanted to pay off (and even threatened) the guy who invented the windshield wiper if he went public stating the idea was HIS and not Ford's. Pharmaceutical companies are no different. Wall Street corruption is no longer a suspicion. Big business will shit on you. They'd pay you off or silence you permanently. Cancer will be the world's leading cause of death by 2010. Do you honestly think the government thinks that's a BAD thing? No. The world is overpopulated already. |
|
Last edited by Jeff777; 04-10-2009 at 03:34 AM.
Things are not as they seem
So uh... who is it that's found the cure for heart disease? :l |
|
I don't know, you tell me smart man. Who indeed? |
|
Last edited by Jeff777; 04-10-2009 at 04:37 AM.
Things are not as they seem
Clearly, you know little about psychology or biology. |
|
Last edited by wasup; 04-10-2009 at 04:36 AM.
I can't say I am sure of a conspiracy theory involving medical and pharmacological industry, but it's the only logical thing to assume - I mean, at least in the city I live, 8 in 10 child bearings are made through cesarean operation.... Why, if natural birth is better both on the mother and on the child's side? Because cesarean operations are more expensive - so all doctors go all the way to recommend it, simply because it means more money for them. There is a vast number of doctors who do only deliver babies if it's through a cesarean operation. |
|
Saying quantum physics explains cognitive processes is just like saying geology explains jurisprudence.
I couldn't agree with you guys more that there exist many, very selfish people. However, this would only confirm my point that many would be unwilling to sell their silence/discovery. Infinite and eternal fame, respect, recognition, and power is to many as large if not a much larger motivator than superficial wealth. This would only be compounded by the great jealousy that one would know they would feel when someone else is credited for their own discovery. Assuming here that the whole "assassinated for business-threatening knowledge" situation didn't exist, let me make it clear that the VAST majority of the population would want to publicize their findings either out of the goodness of their heart OR their own selfish, ego-boosting they would get out of having billions of people appreciate their discovery. |
|
Exactly. |
|
Regardless, the cure would be suppressed depending on who finds it. |
|
This was that cult, and the prisoners said it had always existed and always would exist, hidden in distant wastes and dark places all over the world until the time when the great priest Cthulhu, from his dark house in the mighty city of R'lyeh under the waters, should rise and bring the earth again beneath his sway.
Bookmarks