Um because in vitro meat doesn't have a brain... and is hence no more conscious than a rock? |
|
My body is "alive". My body and all forces acting of it are a direct result of innumerable cells, each of which satisfy the conditions for life on their own. My sperm cells, even when separated from my body, still move around and carry out an actual task beyond 'sit there and metabolize'. If cells are removed from me unharmed, they can be put into a petri dish in a laboratory and grown in culture while still performing the functions of life on their own. If my cells are anything like the cells in a chicken or cow, then how is in-vitro meat any less alive than a chicken or cow raised the regular way? |
|
198.726% of people will not realize that this percentage is impossible given what we are measuring. If you enjoy eating Monterey Jack cheese, put this in your sig and add 3^4i to the percentage listed.
Um because in vitro meat doesn't have a brain... and is hence no more conscious than a rock? |
|
Alive as cabbage and most people don't see a moral conflict in eating that. |
|
I have an idea. All of those male chicks that are being thrown into the grinder could instead be thrown into a big container and PETA and so forth could buy all of the male chicks and keep them alive on big ass farms. The hatcheries would no doubt rather make money off the male chicks than just throw them into a grinder. This could be done with enough support and financial contributions. Who's up for it? |
|
You are dreaming right now.
Great idea! It'll restart the economy! 8D |
|
You're conflating suffering and death. There is only a brief instance of suffering associated with the grinder. Focus on the females having their beaks singed off? |
|
Previously PhilosopherStoned
I dunno about that though. I trim my chickens' beaks back all of the time. If it hurt the that much, then they wouldn't be able to eat. |
|
If it grows to long, then they can't eat, and when they peck amongst each other they can seriously injure one another. But mainly for the eating thing. It's a bigger problem for males though, since they mount the hens and peck at people. Not a major thing, though. I do it about once in a while when they start to grow out. They keep them dull most of the time, but we keep them in in the winter and they start to grow out. That's probably why they cut them like that in the hatcheries: they won't be out wearing their beaks down. |
|
Apparently they even do it in the free range and organic category of farms. |
|
Previously PhilosopherStoned
Ok. Well now I don't know what to think. On the one hand trimming beaks prevents a load of problems (which, by the looks of it, could also be prevented by using free-range farms), but on the other it causes acute/chronic pain in addition to new problems. |
|
Interesting, I guess. Doesn't seem like there is a way around it, though. One way kills livestock, the other may cause accute pain in the beak and face... |
|
Why would they need to de-beak them in a proper free range farm, though? You'd think the problem would get handled as in nature there. (ie. the beak gets ground on sand and stone during normal activities, so that it won't become too long.) |
|
April Ryan is my friend,
Every sorrow she can mend.
When i visit her dark realm,
Does it simply overwhelm.
I'm so glad I'm not in the ag business. Creating food is gross, no matter how you look at it. If I had my way, I wouldn't have to eat at all. I would just photosynthesize by the pool all day. |
|
This is a most interesting and informative thread. Thanks for presenting all sides so well everyone. |
|
I just ate some spicey chicken from KFC, it was good. |
|
Oh jeez, this again. |
|
Bookmarks