Homosexuality, how can it not be considered an abnormality?

**Maria92** · 05-24-2010 01:24 AM

Originally Posted by Thatperson

As bonsay says, most of us are on the same side (so does that make everyone in this thread a homophobe?) Indeed this is one of the major flaws of our Liberal-fascist society, while it appears that most people agree with my point, no one dare say it. Please define a homophobe and how I fit into this definition.

Liberal-fascist society? I do believe it is liberals who believe in personal liberties and freedoms much moreso than conservatives. I don't see liberals trying to regulate how gay people conduct themselves in their own homes. Let's take a look at the chart:

O-ho, look where conservatives fall: right at the low end of self regulation, i.e. government control in personal lives. And fascism? Hardly. We have one of the most capitalist societies in the world. And thanks to liberals, we also have a hell of a lot of personal rights, including the right to shag members of the same sex in Georgia if we so wish.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

Well, that is like asking who are you to tell a blind man that a particular rose is red. If we cannot say what we see, -- well the nasty desire to censure is in all of us.

Ah! Look at that! As if to make my point...so, you support censoring others and keeping them from speaking out? Ah, no, wait, I've got it...people can only speak if they agree with you, is that it?

Originally Posted by Thatperson

Sekhmet, I thought to be homophobic, you had to have some dislike of homosexuals themselves. Something which I do not have.

Sure coming off that way.

Most but there are still a few left who don't see it as malfunctioning from any point of view at all. I still don't understand there reasoning yet, that's the only reason this thread is still active.

What is with this compulsive need to try and force people to agree with you? In terms of individual propagation, it does reduce one's chance to pass on their own genes. But even this, I hardly consider "abnormal," especially in today's society. Define "normal." At what exact percent chance of passing on one's genes is a person "normal?" There are hundreds, if not thousands, of things out there that can all inhibit a person's chance to pass on genes. These so-called defects are common enough that I wouldn't consider them abnormal. Birth control isn't abnormal, so why should homosexuality be? If you want to define it in a purely nature-based sense, homosexuality is found throughout nature. It isn't unnatural. Your arguments have been shot down. The only way I'd consider it abnormal would be if I was forced to look through your skewed, stubborn perspective, but fortunately, that isn't going to happen.