Originally posted by DistantClone
Oh I forgot to mention my theory. Meat is a product which comes from animals, which are from the second dimension. We are in the third dimension, and introducing the relatively slower vibrations (think of it as relatively colder air) into the faster vibrations (warmer air) makes the net temperature somewhere in between. I believe the more meat you eat, the less likely you are to have higher vibration.
More likely is that the high fatty content of meat slows the digestion process and thus, lowers the rate at which your body absorbs energy for remedial use, also lowering the aggregate rate of the body's energy use, and potentially making you lethargic. Eating lots of meat can also mean building lots of fatty tissue which, can decrease your cells' sensitivity to insulin, lowering metabolism, and once again lowering energy use.
Another component of this theory is energy...I think all people have a capacitance to store energy.[/b]
Adipose tissue? Interesting, I never heard it described as \"capacitance,\" before. But that's probably because it's confusing. Capacitors store electric charge. Adipose (fat) stores chemical energy, usually releasing it as heat. Although, charge is definitely stored in the body in the form of ions, it is never released as free electrons, as in the case of a capacitor.
This energy also vibrates, and the more energy that accumulates, the less likely it is to change it's vibrational state (inertia). For example, you have a little cold air, and a lot of warm air...it's going to stay rather warm. If you have a lot of cold air mixed into a little warm air...it's going to make it considerably colder. This would be saying if you eat a lot of meat and don't release, this is the worst case...this will result in the slowest vibrations. However, if you don't eat meat, and have a lot of faster vibrating energy stored, this is the best case. Resetting the energy is a release of old energy and starting over.[/b]
Interesting, but it's hard for me to think you could've done a more effective job of bastardizing so many scientific concepts.
Contrasting male and female, I think this is why women have more intense orgasms...they are biologically set to require more stimulation to release than their male counterpart. Also women have smaller bodies (more on this in the tangent). Basically, to build up, you may touch yourself, but don't release.[/b]
Or it could be that women tend to be more emotionally involved in their sexual experiences, and that orgasm is not often just a pleasurable sensation but a personally intimate and profound explosion of feeling, among other things, safe, secure, confident, appreciated, and loved (and all this potentially admidst fear from vulnerable exposure and uncertainty from anticipation)... and that men could probably feel just as intense if they were more emotionally involved as well.
I really don't know, though, despite my subtle but intended-as-friendly patronization of you in this post. 
To sum up my theory to get the good vibrations, the only meat one should eat is tube steak or tuna (i.e. one's sexual partner).[/b]
And I might as well add that my theory is that all you need is love, or that simply being loved is more than a enough, yeah, yeah... lol, whoever can guess the two songs I just quoted gets a cookie.
|
|
Bookmarks