Elijah, thanks for your apology. I can understand a concern against the abuse of drugs. You are preaching to the choir as far as that goes. I come from two family lines of alcoholics, I have lost several friends to drunk driving wrecks and opioid overdoses, and I have had my own struggles with marijuana and the results of binge drinking. That is why I decided recently to quit everything. I want to do absolutely no mind altering substances whatsoever. That includes caffiene, tobacco, and anything else like that. For me, opening the door to any of them opens the door to all of them. I just realized that recently. However, I am nowhere near supporting telling other people that they can't do them. I think the war on drugs is anti-freedom, anti-American, and a counterproductive disaster that has resulted in a great deal of mass tragedy that would have not otherwise happened. The gang problem and its influence on American pop culture and American life in general is awful. There are drug addicts all over the place mugging, burglarizing, car jacking, stealing from and lying constantly to their family members and friends, and doing whatever else it takes to buy the drugs that are so expensive because they are illegal. If the drugs were legal, they would destroy themselves in peace and not take down everybody around them. The fight needs to be on the demand side. Fighting drugs on the supply side is a tragic joke. The government (last I checked) spends $639 per second on the war on drugs. We could cut out the war on drugs and thereby cut out a whole universe of crime while providing room for tax cuts that would really help our economy a great deal. Our prisons would finally have room enough for murderers, rapists, and armed robbers to stay as long as they should, and they could be convicted much faster. No matter what bad you might say would result from legallizing all drugs, still a trendous amount more good would result.
I think people crave altered states of consciousness because they are so interesting and philosophically educational. I don't think they are an escape from reality. Drug induced altered states usually induce anxiety and often make people freak out about reality on a much more paranoid level than they otherwise would. Altered states give a new format for experiencing and understaning existence, and they are really fascinating.
Matchbook, I understand what you were saying. I was just arguing my point that drugs are not necessary. The last few times I did mushrooms, I wished I could go all the way with the experience and have a lucid dream.
Toomanypossibilities, I am completely with you on the idea that my government is chasing its tail and shattering everything in the room with the war on drugs. However, I am light years from agreeing with you on the war on terror. War is awful, extremely awful. The thing is, the most unfortunate part about human life on Earth is that we are sometimes forced to choose between awful and far worse than awful. The goal of the war on terror is to reduce the threat of terrorism as much as possible. While the war might be pissing off more would-be terrorists, we are picking off tons of them and taking down the gigantic power houses that fund them and could potentially give them weapons that could wipe out many thousands of people in a single bound. We are also creating democracies where tyrranical governments once ruled. The result will be that eventually those countries will prosper and there will be less poverty and the social instability that comes with it. This will lead to a much smaller tendency for people to seek to end their own lives for the purpose of killing masses of innocent people on purpose. They will have things to live for and will be more educated and functional. War sucks, but liberation is a great thing. So is bringing down terrorist governments. As for your game about Bush being the antichrist and controlling the Illuminati for the aliens or whatever it is you think is going on, Bin Laden already confessed with great pride on tape. It was shown on every major news channel that is not controlled by an anti-American propaganda organization. If you win the argument, you are going to have to explain how so many capitalist organizations that are obsessed with financial profits and are in severely intense competition with each other and have everything to lose for fabricating stories (like Dan Rather and the New York Times reporter), and in this case, putting on a fake video, would be willing to roll such crazy dice. You will also have to explain how there has not been a single leak from any of the zillions of people who would have had to have been in on such a wild, bizarre conspiracy.
The good news about altered states of consciousness is that it doesn't take years to achieve all of them. You can learn transcendental meditation in one sitting. Getting in a sensory deprivation tank can spin your head into another dimension the first time you ever try it. I also don't think learning lucid dreaming takes that long for people who are extremely dedicated. It took me a while to get the hang of it because I was very undisciplined because I was so skeptical. Once I had my first long lasting, controllable lucid dream, I 100% believed in it and was very soon able to start having them all the time.
By the way, if anybody wants to argue about the war on terror, please take it to the philosophy forum. People come to the lucid dreaming forums to talk about cool altered state type stuff, not the horrific tragedies of war.
|
|
Bookmarks