Originally posted by willthepathfinder
Perhaps a better question would be, \"Is life an allusion?\"
An allusion is an indirect reference to something. What do you think life is indirectly referring to? Or do you mean \"illusion?\"
Can we know everything about ourselves and the world with our limited five senses?[/b]
We have more than five senses. It's an incredible failing of modern schooling that people aren't commonly aware of this. Just outright a grade F. [i][Edit: Schools are failing
Medical science has shown the existent independence of the kinesthetic sense and the vestibular sense. Also, through victims of certain kinds of sensory paralysis, we know that touch is actually a conglomeration of other independent senses, including heat and pain.
Science is and always has been in the business of discovering new senses.
We contrive devices to probe our world deeper, but with our current concept of reality and limited senses. The data we attain is then interpereted with our limited perception.
Another failing of schooling. I really mean to accommodate us while saying that. I am not saying that you are faulted, but that the teachers and governments who have assumed the role of guiding us have done a poorible job. It's so bad I feel the need to construct a new word for it, meaning both poor and horrible.
That data we attain is interpreted with the use of mathematics. Nothing in mathematics is dependent on perception. That's the whole point.
Think of how far we have come from a thousand years ago and then think about a thousand years from now. I imagin that there will be many who will wonder how we could be so dumb.[/b]
They'll probably just think of our ideas as quaint. For example, when Copernicus said that the Earth was moving through space, there were many logical questions to challenge that statement. If the Earth is spinning, why aren't we flying off of it? Kids have the same questions when they hear that the Earth is moving, and no one would seriously say they are dumb. Their questions reveal their intelligence.
If anything, they will think of our questions as extremely intelligent, the same way we look back on the questions of others with reverence, while knowing their fruits.
Maybe we are living in a dream.[/b]
Notice how different that is, though, from saying, "maybe I am living in a dream." That's essentially the same as, "maybe I am dreaming," and produces a touchstone for lucidity. However, when you say, "maybe we are living in a dream," then who is the dreamer? Us? God? Amorphous matter? Suzy?
If you can't identify the dreamer, you cannot know that life is a dream.
I really should have made it clear in the first post that I wasn't looking for metaphor, simile, allegory, figurative language, or other poetic devices.
Howetzer, for example, if I had asked for that, it might have made your answer a whole lot easier. You do not appear to think that life is a dream but rather that it is dream-like, in which case your answer would be a "no."
|
|
Bookmarks