Tell your friend that he is a pseudoskeptic, to use his own term against him.
How does he explain how one can slip in and out of lucidity all within the context of the same dream? Or how a lucid dream can be surrounded, on both sides, by two non-lucid dreams?
Despite all of the
mountains of evidence that lucid dreaming exists (not to even mention the multi-tiered report that CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta did on Sleep and Dreams, in which he explained the reality of lucid dreaming, through mainstream media. Look it up if you wanna.) your friend simply chooses not to believe it.
By his logic,
dreams, themselves, are a pseudoscience. They must not exist because there is no empirical evidence of the existence of dreams. How can you have proof of a vision in someone's head? There is none. Only first-hand accounts of having them. Does this mean that everybody that recalls having a dream, including your friend, "doesn't know the human mind" and only
thinks they are seeing images in their sleep? Following this train of thought, visual imagination, itself, must not exist, either. I mean, how can we prove that an artist can see a fully detailed rendering of his work, inside of his head? We can't. It must not exist. This is downright ignorant. (not to insult your friend)
Easiest way to convince him? Tell him to read all the
blue entries in my journal.

And if he still wants to argue, tell him to drop me a PM under your account.

[/b]
Bookmarks