Quote Originally Posted by Loaf
And while your at it, why not share your reasons for why astral projection to Mars is real and I can how share dream with the queen every night through simply meditation. Those are other hole ridden ideas that people have no basis for believing in but do.
I decided to quote this first, because if this is indicative of the type of logic you're using, then it really isn't even worth my defense. This is an obvious strawman. It's actually kind of insulting. That you imply my theory (which apparently 'has no basis for belief', simply because you say it doesn't) is analogous to people believing astral travel and dream sharing is real (concepts which are completely unrelated to the discussion, and not even hinted at by anything in my post) makes your argument look weaker than anything said so far.

Quote Originally Posted by Loaf
The question I was discussing was whether or not social interaction in dreams can allow for social growth or for the dreamer to deal with social situations better in reality. The answer is no.
You mean your assumption is 'No.' It is a theory that your are putting forth. It is an assertion that you are responsible for providing evidence for, or it is meaningless. You should probably stop stating such an assumption as if it is fact, lest you come off as hypocritical. It's also important to notice that I have not once made the declaration that dreams will help you socially. I have simply proposed the idea, and why it might be true. I have not 'stated it as fact', as you so strategically tried to imply.

You, on the other hand, have done just that, in your assertion that it does not.

Quote Originally Posted by Loaf
Ambiguously referring to it as a "simulation" pretty much seals the idea that you are more interested in pointless word play than writing anything of substance.
No, it doesn't, because that's what dreams are. They are simulations. If someone can gain a real-life advantage from a simulation (whether it be a video game, a roleplay situation), it stands to reason that they may be able to do the same, from a dream. That you're trying to detract from this by implying that dreams are not simulations does nothing to counter the logic.


Quote Originally Posted by Loaf
This isn't about my evidence. Its about yours. Its your job to prove your theory, not mine.
Wrong again. You're commiting the classic 'atheist vs. anti-theist' blunder; thinking that your position doesn't require evidence, simply because it is a negative one. The atheist doesn't require evidence, because absense of a belief in something is not synonymous with the belief in the opposite. Someone who says "I have no belief in a God" is not inherently saying "God Does Not Exist." Someone making such a declarative statement about the absense of God is subject to providing evidence for the theory. It is in the same vein that someone who says a flamboyant kid must not have had a father figure in his life cannot then turn around and say "well it's your job to prove to me that he did." It would actually be that person's job to prove that he didn't, or his assertion is insubstantial. In your case, you are making the declarative statement that lucid dreaming 'cannot' help you in waking life social situations. This is an assertion, and it is one that you are just as responsible for evidencing, as someone who argues to the contrary.
You see how that works?

But, with all that out of the way, I'll back up a little bit, and provide a little rationale as to why I think lucid dreaming may benefit dreamers in the waking world.

Spoiler for Stuff:


There is no way around the notion that dreams are simulations. Are they exact copies of real situations? No, but what simulation is? As I said before, there are mounds of information backing the idea that simulations can help with real-world phobias, and I don't believe there is much reason to assume that lucid dreams would not fall into that catagory. I'm interesting in hearing why you do? (And whether you agree with it or not, this is completely relevant.)