I like this guy heeh.

Well I was going to write all that i did down but im lazy =/

Simplified, carbondating is flawed

Isotonic radiometrics using various other elements is more accurate, yes there have been cases where the various methods did not agree but if you take a rolex and a timex, find they dont show the same time, is it safe to assume that all watcehs are incorrect even though the majority show the same time?

Even the case that did not agree Isotonic dating of the bed of the grandcanyon using .. crap I think Ar and Sr... the methods disagreed, but both showed the rock at the bottom of the canyon to be at least 500mil years old.

ok so question, before the flood, how long was the earth in existance?

as for the whole 6 day thing
I dont think you can take the word Day litrally, think about it, What is being said is from gods perspective....an infinite beings perspective might be a bit different from our own.

sooooo anywhoo... its tough to say eaither way, sure there aer websites bashing the other one using the same data to prove their point as the other is using to disprove its a mess, the internet is a giant rumor mill AND anyone can make a website look official and scientific if you bog it down with so much jargon and mathematics that no one bothers to read through it and see the flaws inherent in it...

Dont beleive everything you read on the internet folks.

Im on the fence with this for now... I got some dreaming to do...