Hey everybody! This just occured to me. Do you think that LDing could in some period of time become embedded in the DNA or the memory of human beings? |
|
TODAY is the greatest day of all!!!
memory of the human being: yes |
|
"you only lose what you cling to"
Do you mean of an individual human, or the species as a whole? |
|
I'll add an example a friend of mine told me to clarify... |
|
TODAY is the greatest day of all!!!
I think it is possible that some people may have special genetic make up or hormones that allow them to LD easier than others. I began thinking about this before I even thought of lucid dreams by looking at my family. I have always had very vivid dreams and can always remember them ATLEAST one every night. My sister, brother and mom are the exact same way. However, I've talked to friends, including my boyfriend, and thier dreams seem to be rather boring, logical and they hardly ever remember thier dreams and claim that they don't dream every night. This got me thinking that maybe my mom had a specific "make-up" for it and passed it a long to myself, my sister and brother. |
|
|
|
Technically, the ability to WILD could be genetic seeing as having SP as a disorder is supposed to be genetic. |
|
Yeah I agree.... apparently my sister has had WILDS before I even explained them to her. She's entered a dream fully conscious lying still trying to sleep and she thought everyone had this! |
|
The idea that LDing could become imbedded into DNA assumes there are genes which contribute the the phenomena of LDs. If this is the case, then the LD genes (there could be hundreds or thousands of them to produce the effect) are subject to genetic drift and natural selection so that they spread throughout the population and reach some equilibrium which may or may not conform to Hardy-Weinberg for obvious reasons. The LD itself may not affect DNA, but rather, the composition (mutations, polymorphisms, etc etc) of the DNA would more likely affect the LD. This all falls under the realm of molecular biology, and I must add that it is difficult to support a teleological argument without some biological knowledge. |
|
wow LOL!! |
|
Bookmarks