Very interesting indeed. I do agree that alot of it has to do with apathy, lazyness and ubiquitous rigidity in professors. I consider my thought processes to be scientific and in a perfect world, logical in nature. I personally am very concerned with the progression of psychology beyond the metaphysic consensus for the application and use the interpretation of dreams. I would like to see more of the metrics for analyzation that Wyatt Ehrenfels has developed. Honestly, I can understand some of the resistance. It really is difficult to measure an interpretation of an event as opposed to the ability to compare your own interpretation against the subjects. The scientific community needs an accepted standardized method to translate a dream instead of interpreting it.......

Im off to Google to read up on Ehrenfels work!