Thread: All your lazy words..

Originally Posted by Alex D

Really I don't think every new technique should be an ILD, I mean look at WBTB, muvh easier to remember because it's more distinct.

That's really the clearest way to name a technique that induces lucid dreams. Wake-induced-lucid-dream as opposed to what? Staying Conscious While Falling Asleep? SCWFA?

Yeah, I was very confused by that when I first started as well. But (and Abra gave you the link) I found it in the tutorial section.

Originally Posted by webmaster

That's really the clearest way to name a technique that induces lucid dreams. Wake-induced-lucid-dream as opposed to what? Staying Conscious While Falling Asleep? SCWFA?

The -ILD thing did it for me.


It would be e.g. as opposed to D·ILD

... "dreaming InducedLucidDream"?

Not sure though..

I really see no reason why one cannot just type the 4 words, instead of the stupid letters...

Sure it is OK when one understand them.

But the only reason why people use these abbreviations are pure lazyness.. I know cause I use; BTW, NB, LOL, etcetera....

They are just a bit more sensible! :p (Easier to make sense of.)