Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Why free them? The guy they beat unconscious was innocent of doing anything criminal. He was reportedly an asshole, but being beaten senseless was way out of line. I don't understand that outcry at all, and too many people are crying it out. The perpetrators deserve fair trials, and obviously the justice system in Jena is insane and needs to be corrected, but I am nowhere near thinking those horrible sons of bitches should be freed. Why do you want them free to walk the streets with such sociopathic tendencies and histories?
That is where I stand. I don't pardon them at all, but everybody deserves fairness under the law. And the noose gang made a death threat as far as I am concerned, and they should be in jail too. Every criminal perpetrator in the entire story should be in jail.
22 years is probably too much, and the charge should have been aggravated assault instead of attempted murder, but the attack was not called for. It might have been provoked, but not criminally. Imagine it being your innocent son they did that to. Every perpetrator in that story sucks and should be dealt with under the law in the right way.
Right, well I agree with you that the boys should be tried fairly and deserve a just form of punishment...not to walk away scott free, but I think what you fail to realize is that Michael Bell (black guy whose in jail) was beaten down by Justin Barker's (guy michael and his friends beat down) friends earlier, previous to the shotgun incident. He (michael) was invited to a party by a white friend of his and a woman at the door wouldn't let michael in, telling him the party wasn't for people like him. A white guy jumped in the middle of their conversation (Justin's friend) and beat the crap out of Michael. Some others beat Michael down as well if i'm not mistaken. But one thing I know is that no charges were brought against the people who fought the jena 6 first, but when the jena 6 struck back against a member of the group that assaulted michael earlier on, all of them were thrown in prison and had unjust charges thrown at them. There's no god damn sense in that.
I agree with Martin Luther King III, the jena 6 boys should be tried justly and some form of punishment should be given to them...but giving a 16 year old boy 22 years in prison is NOT just...especially when you've convinced the jury that michael's tennis shoes he kicked justin with were "Deadly murder weapons."
Originally Posted by goldney
From what I gathered from the story the guy they attacked was not innocent but one of the students who was involved in the thing (which I have completely forgotten about). Anyway, I always felt that the guy they attacked was distinctly not innocent, deserved what he got and wasn't injured too badly. He went to a party that very same day on which he was attacked later in the evening!
Justin Barker (the guy who was beaten) had minor cuts and a swollen eye, evidently he was well enough to attend a social function that night as you pointed out. And you're right...he wasn't innocent. He racially taunted them on numerous accounts regularly calling them words and names only a slave master in the 1800's would use. Personally speaking...I would have decked the guy myself.
|
|
Bookmarks