Um, utilitarianism maybe? |
|
I'm in a debate class and I am writing affirmative and negative cases for this resolution: When the United States is engaged in military conflict, the demands of national security ought to supercede conflicting claims of individual rights. The problem is I don't know what the value is. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
Um, utilitarianism maybe? |
|
Wow! Talk about being gouged: |
|
*sigh* |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
I guess your teacher plagiarized then? |
|
Hell if I know or care. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
Is the assignment about coming up with situations where that "value" would have primarily positive (affirmative) and negative reactions/outcomes? That's kind of how I understand it. |
|
"If there was one thing the lucid dreaming ninja writer could not stand, it was used car salesmen."
I am writing cases that will be used in a debate. One for the Affirmative (agreeing with resolution) side, and one for the Negative (disagreeing with resolution) side. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
Court cases? Events in the past that have used this "resolution"? Try looking up "National Security vs. Individual Rights" or "overruling individual rights." |
|
"If there was one thing the lucid dreaming ninja writer could not stand, it was used car salesmen."
I don't mean to be rude but.....what part of debate cases did I make unclear? Not court cases, debate cases. |
|
Surrender your flesh. We demand it.
Bookmarks