I can only hope this will help! And probably better than other devices. |
|
|
|
I can only hope this will help! And probably better than other devices. |
|
Check your memory, did any suprising event happpen ? does the present make sense ? visualize what you will do when lucid, and how. Reality check as reminder of your intention to lucid dream tonight. Sleep as good as you can; when going to sleep, relax and invite whatever comes with curiosity. Grab your dream journal immediately as you awake and write everything you can recall (if only when you wake up for good). Keep calm, positive and persistent, and don't forget to have fun along the way
Oh, I happened to came to start this thread as well. |
|
I pledged my money just over a week ago, I have a lot of confidence in these guys. |
|
Last edited by DREAMER242000; 12-24-2013 at 08:07 PM.
How are they training people to recognise the cues? That's always the biggest problem to overcome. |
|
My LDing record, if you want to hear about it, is about 4 WILDs, 1 DEILD, and the rest DILDs.
I'd like to see proof that it actually works like they make it seem that it does, so I know that it isn't just an expensive alarm clock. Also, that lady is a dream control master! I wish that I had that kind of control, to just move my hand and the whole dream world changes. It sounds like a really cool product if it works. |
|
What you see in the video is a simple prototype. |
|
I wish them luck! |
|
From what I can tell, this looks like another scam. All they have is a photoshopped image of a brainwave on an iPhone. And that box with flashing lights. It looks exactly like the "knight rider" project that they teach electrical engineering students during their first week! |
|
$90k funding goal reached as of yesterday. |
|
"Reject culture..." "Put the Art pedal to the metal!"
- Terence McKenna
Hey Paulfitz, where are you getting the information about no amplification and no reference electrode? Actually, the reference electrode doesn't need to be on an earlobe. It can be positioned as just another electrode, anywhere near the others, since it is usually used to cancel common-mode noise from mains hum. Clean EEG signals are not difficult to get with a few op amps and some passives. The difficult part for the device is the algorithm to reliably detect when you are in REM. |
|
And the team behind it is working with sleep clinics to fine-tune their algorithm, which is, from what they have said, really precise. |
|
Seems very suspicious to me also. For reference decent real time brain wave readers that provide enough data and speed for actual graphs like that are massive and require lots of wires. The only thing something small like that might provide is like movement in a game. Here is an example 130322_FT_eeg_patient.jpg |
|
Last edited by pointofbeing; 01-02-2014 at 09:35 AM.
Hi! Jack from iWinks here to help answer some questions. |
|
Last edited by anderj101; 01-31-2016 at 11:03 PM. Reason: Removed prohibited Kickstarter link
How do you accurately record an EEG with a single probe and no ground? You guy's need multiple leads and an amplifier for accuracy, you say you don't need a full 256 or 512 electrode egg cap, but for the thing to be remotely accurate for when it thinks I'm in rem at the very least around 12 electrodes would be needed, otherwise you will receive a very noisy signal. At best with one contact you guy's are approximating rem very inaccurately. |
|
Last edited by pointofbeing; 01-03-2014 at 03:04 PM.
looking at the headband, it does not contain more than 2 max contacts, and where is the amp? Imho That thing is not going to be accurate at all. They can show it displaying a graph till they are blue in the face (even in real time), the fact they are claiming to get accurate rem readings from as few contacts as they have in one spot on your head is misleading at best and downright dishonest. They need to say we are creating a cool piece of kit that can loosely read your brain state, I would buy it if they were more honest about it. They make it out like this thing down right precisions when you rem. It can't. It only has one channel that is not good, plus there is no ground since it's using Bluetooth. Signal amplitude calibration, and signal to noise ratio will be very bad. Any eye movement artifacts, Muscular Artifacts, will overload the frontopolar and frontotemporal electrodes. How does this thing calibrate anyway? I grantee this thing is full of 60hz noise. It's a cool science experiment, but until somebody makes an lucid dreaming mask, band ect eeg with removable electrodes, and a lot more of them, not a worthy 150+ dollar product. |
|
Hi pointofbeing, |
|
Last edited by iWinks; 01-03-2014 at 05:59 PM.
Hey Jack, |
|
Yes you have 3 electrodes, but the ground is passive, meaning you only have two active contacts, which is the minimum for a channel. The point I'm making is not that you guys are making a bad product, just that given that you only have one channel, it's going to be inaccurate and full of noise. This is not a fault of you, or your product it's a fault of science. Obviously you cant just wear a full cap and plug in all the electrodes it would be invasive and ungodly expensive. You are making a device that is reasonably priced and simple, but it's got flaws simply because of it's simple nature. You can't get accuracy from a single channel, nobody could. If you are detecting rem, how? How does a single channel detect rem not just once and a while but all the time? How does it deal with the potential 60hz noise? |
|
That is something that is realistically going to vary from person to person. The device takes out a huge chunk of the work for lucid dreaming (by giving you a reliable cue that you are in REM), but ultimately it comes down to the user. Some people may succeed on the first night and some may take a while longer. I think for people on this thread it would work quite well, given that you all have an interest in dreaming in general. |
|
Last edited by iWinks; 01-05-2014 at 01:17 AM.
Bookmarks