 Originally Posted by Vampireboy
So do we tend to get alot of realistic looking landscapes? No Dali/Escher style nonsense?
I always get amused/annoyed watching movies, viewing art, or reading about dreams, and all they can do is make the dreams appear utterly surreal with impossible or terribly disfigured landscapes and characters. Trouble is, though these images might be remembered upon waking as surreal, during the Non-lucid dream they're perfectly realistic. Normal, non-lucid dreams are always described by how they are remembered, with waking-life experience intruding to "interpret" the experience.
As someone said above, when you're not lucid, everything in the dream seems perfectly real and in the right place, with all detail exactly as it should be. Surreal is literally impossible, because as a Dream Character yourself, you are part of the reality in which your dreaming mind has placed you, and as such you "belong," and everything just seems right..
When lucid we can notice that the picture isn't as perfect as we thought, but expectation and interest in staying lucid makes LD'ers able to "accept" the oddness. If an LD'er demands that everything to be waking-life real, they often wind up with gray, simple schemas and sort of dull DC's. Of course, the other side of this is that if the LD'er remembers that the dream world is her own, she also knows that an open mind and vivid imagination will bring her all the surrealism she can conjure, and more!
P.S.: before you all note them, I agree that there are exceptions to every rule...
|
|
Bookmarks