Thread: How far should tolerance go? Where do we draw the line?

Originally Posted by sloth

If one can say that a sadist is a masochist who does unto others, then what can be said for this "golden rule"?

Are you implying that an equality of one thing is invalidated because of an inequality of another? i.e. that there is not also an individual equality to achieve, besides a social one? Is that the wisdom you wish to impart?

One of the ways that people fall into the trap of errant predication is because they simply cannot follow an idea.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

Are you implying that an equality of one thing is invalidated because of an inequality of another? i.e. that there is not also an individual equality to achieve, besides a social one? Is that the wisdom you wish to impart?

One of the ways that people fall into the trap of errant predication is because they simply cannot follow an idea.

I mesh synergistic functionalities and enable granular schemas while synergizing intuitive channels on an enabled scalable metrics system. If you enhance the proactive action-items the virtual drive deliverables will incentivize real-time achitectures and deliver strategic orchestrate turn-key functions.

What I am stating is that if a masochist treats others the way that he would like to be treated he would be considered to be a sadist. I don't go in any particular direction at that point in my expression, or my thoughts, for I think it is merely something to think about, and has many different interpretations.

Thank you for asking me to repeat myself, but double posting, deliberately is bad manners.