Thread: Thoughts have frequencies. My theory of everything.

HaRd_WiReD, I agree completely with your theory of everything. It has been shown that everything has a frequency based on it's mass. And basically everything that happens, has some sort of frequency to it. A horizontal line can be created by two periodic sine waves of the same frequency but with a 180 degree phase shift. Also, any signal can be broken down into a sum of sine waves, each of which oscillated at a certain frequency. Signals are sent in frequencies, which do change. Some signals are sent in impulses, which may at first seem to be lacking a frequency. However, when mathematically modeled, impulses can be dealt with by use of the heaviside function in combination with a fourrier series (an infinite sum of sine waves, which have frequencies).

It makes sense to me that our thoughts too would have some frequency to them. Our voices have a frequency of vibration to them, and if we want, we can create a voice in our head with our thoughts. Also, everything we see has a frequency to it, with different frequencies being responsible for different colors. Everything we hear is a result of vibrational frequencies in whatever medium we're immersed in. I don't know enough about biology to say much about the other 3 senses. Our thoughts are mainly duplications of some combination of our senses, only expressed internally, in our imaginations. As our senses have a frequency to them, I'd say our replications of these same senses in thought, also have a frequency. However, as all our senses originate from our sensory organs, sending electric signals to our brains. And electric signals have a frequency to them, I believe all thought has a frequency.

When you're dreaming, you're the only one who has any beliefs / expectations as to what will happen in each situation, and as a result, you decide what will happen in your dreams. I don't know about anyone else, but for me, my dreams are just as vivid, if not more so than waking life (due to the brain creating the neural signals, instead of waiting to receive them, this cuts out any delay time, as well as any imperfections in our sensory organs that could distort how we perceive information.)

So, I would say the main difference between dreams and waking life is that in waking life, it is more than just you who are conscious and imposing beliefs on things.

As belief is the determining factor as to what happens in dreams, it's not too far of a stretch to say it has at least some impact in our waking lives. Belief in yourself will allow you to overcome many obstacles in our waking lives for instance. Also, aside from the randomness of dreams, (from you alone controlling them), dreams are nearly identical to reality.

If you were to consider the billions of people on this planet, each with their own beliefs as to how things will happen, clearly everyone's beliefs cannot be satisfied as there will be conflicting beliefs. This is most easily seen with all the different religions people believe in.

So if belief still controls everything, but everyone is believing different things, I think it would be what is most strongly believed that would come to be. Although there could be a wide variety of factors to consider, such as how different the belief is, how isolated the event to take place would be, how within a range of possibilities it is, and how much focus and legitimate belief without a doubt is behind what is to happen.

All the laws of reality we have, are just models of repeated events that have been observed. They do not govern what happens, they just attempt to explain a very small piece of what happens. In many cases, certain things happen that follow very predictable patterns, and the corresponding "laws" that govern them are very accurate. For other cases, there is a lot more "randomness" (a good word to use for, "we can't fit this into a mathematical model") involved, and the "laws" that govern those situations, are not as accurate at describing what happens, as there will be some events that do not follow these laws.

What I'm trying to say, is that the universe is way too complex to ever be completely described by any set of laws we could ever come up with. The best we can do is find trends in data, and relate these trends to a given set of variables through some mathematical function.

For instance, fluids flowing through pipes follow a very predictable flow pattern based on the fluid's density, viscosity, velocity, and pipe diameter. However, when any one of these variables becomes too large, the flow becomes turbulent, and as a result, the flow becomes unpredictable, and all the laws that applied previously, no longer apply at all. (Viscosity has the inverse effect, with the flow becoming turbulent at a very low viscosity) This does not invalidate the laws which apply before the variables are outside the range that causes turbulence, it just imposes limits on when these laws can be used.

Another example could be the stresses in a solid material. In a beam, the stress follows a linear relationship between the applied force, and the shape and size of the beam. But consider this same beam but near corners and supports, and these relationships that are very accurate away from such corners and supports, become unusable, and we have to resort to a numerical guess and check type of iteration to determine anything, the results of which do not follow a pattern we can model.

To avoid some likely confusion, my definition of a law is as follows:

The laws of science are various established scientific laws, or physical laws as they are sometimes called, that are considered universal and invariable facts of the physical world. Laws of science may, however, be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them. A "law" differs from hypotheses, theories, postulates, principles, etc., in that a law is an analytic statement, usually with an empirically determined constant. A theory may contain a set of laws, or a theory may be implied from an empirically determined law.

On a side note, we are taught in schools to believe many of these laws.