Thread: Why Christians are not just a load of backwards imbeciles.

.. advantage either way ... remain in the population.

I'm sure the 8 million blond hair blue eyed video drones of Hollywood would agree, Xei.

Originally Posted by Ne-yo

Yup, Chayba makes a good point. Unless you can find a naturally occurring code that occurs by naturalistic means, you and your band of non-believers don't really have an argument. DNA is like a blueprint. It pre-codes in advance for something other than itself. You simply do not get things like that to occur naturally. Which is the reason why there is absolutely no natural process known to Science that creates coded information.

Humans constantly produce information. We are a product of nature.

I'd meant to write a reply to OP when the thread first started but didn't. The threads pretty far off track by now but it's worth a shot I guess.

Originally Posted by Rickrold

All around the interwebs I have noticed that most non-Christains are extremely hostile to all Christians, automatically vilifying them without really knowing what Christians believe, and before they know that apart from the central tenants of the faith there is a great amount of disagreement within Christianity on issues such as the age of the Earth/universe.

I think that most atheists are aware of the things that you have mentioned. Specifically, an atheist is more likely to be able to answer questions about the bible than a christian is: survey results

Not all of us believe that the world was created in seven literal days, and that those who believe otherwise will burn in hell.

Right. This is where I start to go from "Wow you're religion is incredibly silly and, in some circumstances, outright dangerous" to thinking that the individual has serious mental problems. The fact seems to be that most debates about christianity end up with some "representing" christian claiming that evolution is a fraud. This sort of stuff tends to skew perceptions, you know? Having creationists represent the "christians are intelligent" camp is like having me represent the "atheists aren't assholes" camp. There are a lot of non-asshole atheists, I just don't happen to be one of them. Likewise, there are plenty of christians that aren't drooling, backwards imbeciles and creationists just don't happen to be among them.

Personally, I think that everything proven by science to be true is true. I am not entirely sure of my position on evolution: I am considering it as a possibility. I see no reason why man's body could not possibly have arisen by natural means. I believe that everything in the Bible is true, but I am open to varying interpretations of the text.

Wait a minute. Do you see the contradiction there?

I'm just so tired of everyone calling us all backwards, sub-70-IQ hicks.

I would get the creationists under control if you want this to stop. Also, note the typical christian whining. Pretty much only atheists are going to be calling you backwards hicks. Atheists make up a relatively small (but thank christ, growing) percentage of the population. So *everyone* doesn't think you're a bunch of idiots. The majority of people in my country for instance don't think that you're a bunch of idiots. You guys are the majority. So if you really feel that *everyone* is calling you an idiot, then there are a lot of christians doing it too.

Claiming the first cell spawned out of random chemicals bumping into eachother, is the same like saying that the first computer came into existence by random junk from a junkyard bumping into eachother and accidently creating a computer. However, the first cell is way more complex than the first computer.

Just as it is obvious and logical that computers must have been created, it is also obvious that cells and DNA must have been created.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Claiming the first cell spawned out of random chemicals bumping into eachother, is the same like saying that the first computer came into existence by random junk from a junkyard bumping into eachother and accidently creating a computer. However, the first cell is way more complex than the first computer.

Cells and electric circuits are not comparable, in any way, at all. They are completely different life forms. Also, you have absolutely no basis for saying that the first cell is more complex than the first computer. This is just one of those facts you like to pull out of your ass, when you know you've been defeated in the existing discussion, but don't want to admit it.

edit: pretty good image Xei

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Claiming the first cell spawned out of random chemicals bumping into eachother, is the same like saying that the first computer came into existence by random junk from a junkyard bumping into eachother and accidently creating a computer. However, the first cell is way more complex than the first computer.

Just as it is obvious and logical that computers must have been created, it is also obvious that cells and DNA must have been created.

Originally Posted by Xei

http://www.dreamviews.com/f37/why-ch...ml#post1586413

You're a liar and you know it.

Originally Posted by Marvo

Cells and electric circuits are not comparable, in any way, at all. They are completely different life forms. Also, you have absolutely no basis for saying that the first cell is more complex than the first computer. This is just one of those facts you like to pull out of your ass, when you know you've been defeated in the existing discussion, but don't want to admit it.

edit: pretty good image Xei

You have absolutely no basis for saying that the first computer is more complex than the first cell. This is just one of those fact you like to pull out of your ass, when you know you've been defeated in the existing discussiong, but won't admit it.

Also, posting a picture of a dodgeball to counter my argument, is pretty ironic as it is dodging the argument.

Still not gunna reply to my post?

Considering it was

a) before yours and
b) will answer your questions,

the basic etiquette of discourse dictates that you're a duplicitous idiot.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

You have absolutely no basis for saying that the first computer is more complex than the first cell. This is just one of those fact you like to pull out of your ass, when you know you've been defeated in the existing discussiong, but won't admit it.

You made a claim. I want you to prove it. Do it.

Xei posted the dodgeball image, because you completely ignored his last post and decided to put the discussion in an entirely different direction. This is what we call "dodging" in internet discussion.

Lol please, there have been 100 arguments against me, and I have countered 99 of them, saying I ignore his post on purpose is just silly. How about you just ask the question again instead of whining like a little bitch?

Originally Posted by Xei

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Sure nature has logic to it, but what is the logic behind a cell, or a virus, or a bacteria, being created out of nothing but chemicals bumping into eachother?




The cell is the most complex thing in existence, as the human body is created entirely, out of one cell. So how did this cell come into existence?

Do you understand how cell walls form spontaneously?

Is this the question you are talking about? How about first answering my question? My question came first, so etiquette requires you first answer my question, then I'll answer yours.

So you go ahead and whine and cry that I don't answer your question, but you do the same to me. What is up with that attitude?

Anyway, so xei, you are claiming, cells form spontaneously? What are you trying to say here?

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Lol please, there have been 100 arguments against me, and I have countered 99 of them, saying I ignore his post on purpose is just silly. How about you just ask the question again instead of whining like a little bitch?

Xei already did. Look up. And please don't call me a little bitch, I've been fairly civil most of this time. Also, I'd like you to prove your claim that the first cell is more complex than the first computer, and I'd also like to see you explain the similarity between these two completely different things, so that we can understand whether you actually had a reason to bring this subject into the discussion (computers) or if we you just wanted to dodge Xei's post. Which is what it looks like right now.

So to sum it up:
1) Answer Xei's post.
2) Prove your claim about computers and cells.
3) Stop insulting me.

Lol I didn't say you were a little bitch, I said you were whining like one; but anyway sorry about that, I take it back, I did not mean to hurt your feelings.

Why I say the first cell is more complex than the first computer is because out of the cell, all life came. I think we can all agree, that life is more complex than computers.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Is this the question you are talking about? How about first answering my question? My question came first, so etiquette requires you first answer my question, then I'll answer yours.

So you go ahead and whine and cry that I don't answer your question, but you do the same to me. What is up with that attitude?

Anyway, so xei, you are claiming, cells form spontaneously? What are you trying to say here?

I'm trying to say, "do you understand how cell walls form spontaneously?".

I'll let lie the fact that you're still dodging the 'why did God make cholera cells' question. Just so long as you understand that you are lying to yourself and your beliefs are wrong.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Lol I didn't say you were a little bitch, I said you were whining like one. Anyway, agreed you didn't deserve that one, sorry about that.

Why I say the first cell is more complex than the first computer is because out of the cell, all life came. I think we can all agree, that life is more complex than computers.

I don't agree with that.

Originally Posted by Xei

I'm trying to say, "do you understand how cell walls form spontaneously?".

I'll let lie the fact that you're still dodging the 'why did God make cholera cells' question. Just so long as you understand that you are lying to yourself and your beliefs are wrong.

I asked a question first you're the one dodging my questions here. I have no idea how cell walls from spontaneously. I have no idea how this is relevant to the discussion. I have no idea why God made cholera cells. I also have no idea why God made you.

Marvo you seriously don't agree that life is way more complex than computers? Or is this same kind of lame joke?

Life is still a mystery. The mechanisms of the brain are still a mystery. Computers are not.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

I asked a question first you're the one dodging my questions here.

define:socratic method - Google Search

Do you understand how cell walls form spontaneously?

I have no idea why God made cholera cells lol.

lol, but it does logically follow that God is malicious and sadistic, lololo. Why else would he cause people to die of exhaustive diarrhoea rofl??

Evolution? Duh. Survival of the fittest.

Btw, I am the one asking you questions and you still have ignored about 10 of them. I have answered all your questions.

Instead of using the socratic method, how about you just get to the point already? Because cell walls form spontanously, the whole cell forms spontanously, is that your point?

Originally Posted by Xei

Do you understand how cell walls form spontaneously?

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

I asked a question first you're the one dodging my questions here. I have no idea how cell walls from spontaneously. I have no idea how this is relevant to the discussion. I have no idea why God made cholera cells. I also have no idea why God made you.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Marvo you seriously don't agree that life is way more complex than computers? Or is this same kind of lame joke?

Life is still a mystery. The mechanisms of the brain are still a mystery. Computers are not.

Computers are certainly a mystery. We still keep making them better and better, constantly finding out how new things that we can use to improve circuits. Computer science isn't the same as molecular biology, but they are both incredibly advanced fields. Some of the algorithms we employ in software is just astounding. And it's just the tip of the iceberg.

Yeah computers are a total mystery, that is how we made them. Through mystery science.

Originally Posted by ChaybaChayba

Evolution? Duh. Survival of the fittest.

Consistent.

Instead of using the socratic method, how about you just get to the point already? Because cell walls form spontanously, the whole cell forms spontanously, is that your point?

A basic cell wall is roughly as complex as a balloon.

Now, if you stumbled across something that looked like a balloon, you would obviously think it's man made, right? The structure has a clear purpose and can't have formed randomly.

Hence cell walls are designed and do not form naturally.

For a cell wall to form naturally, it would be like a hurricane hits a materials factory and thousands of rubber molecules happen to clump together by chance and form a balloon, which is a mathematical impossibility.

The above 'arguments' are analogous to yours. However, there is an easily understandable mechanism by which cell walls form naturally. Hence the above arguments are wrong.

You just said everything that I believe.
I agree 100%.
If you ever run into a christian who denies anything from science just ask "Why couldn't god used evolution to create man, just like he used the burning bush to talk to man?"