\"Universal Mind\" Awaken4e1, I did not change the subject. You called me a damn frog, so I truthfully pointed out that it is you who is a frog. Your evasiveness shows it. Get it?[/b]
(Where in my post did I name you, O’ though your response says a lot?)
And again, I do not think and have not said that limiting oneself is a sign of lack of power at all. It is a sign of indifference in the case you are describing. Do I need to say that again? I don't miss your answers and counters. You for the most part haven't been giving them. [/b]
(How can giving man an experiential understanding of his Creator, with all that entails be indifferent? Man must know all things to be as God his Father is, so man must know both good and evil to have a clear and concise understanding of God’s fullness.)
You just committed the same fallacy in logic that you have been committing the entire time. You are talking about musts and have to's, which signs of lack of power are. An infinitely powerful being would not HAVE TO limit himself. [/b]
(As I have stated in many of my previous replies to you, and others is you can not grasp God wonders through logic. As you have made know in this post, your walk with God changed when you began to allow your carnal mind control the conditions in which you believe in what God says, and does. The carnal mind can not comprehend spiritual things, and man walking through evil, sufferings and lack are spiritual necessities.)
That is what I am saying. If God is infinitely powerful, he has no musts and has to have. If I put a rule on myself that I can't save you from drowning because I have a plan, I can change the rule I put on myself. If I am INFINITELY POWERFUL, I can change the rule and make it where it never existed, and even make it where there is NO PROBLEM WITH DOING THAT. [/b]
(And, as I have stated again, and again, the limitations which God has placed Himself under are for man’s maturity. Man must suffer to grow beyond what his carnal nature has limited him to be, and that is why not all men follow the voice of the spirit because their carnal nature will not allow them to hear the spirit, just as yours did when you began to believe what you brain could not comprehend (doubt). You stopped believing in what your heart was telling you, and started believing what your head was telling you, sad.)
An infinitely powerful being could unlimited his limits. More importantly, he could have refrained from limiting himself in the first place. If his not doing that results in suffering, then he is indifferent. I can't believe you keep talking about rules an infinitely powerful being would have to follow. An infinitely powerful being would not have to limit himself. Got it yet? If he doesn't have to limit himself and does any way and that results in suffering, then he is indifferent to suffering. [/b]
(See, I think that this is one of the most arrogant statements I have ever read. Anyway, just as every living thing reproduces, the procedure begins the same for every living thing. There is a beginning, which consists of the most basic, and elementary components of life itself an egg and seed. So, God also must reproduce himself through the most elementary components (mankind) is the egg in which He place His seed through (Mary)
God began to make a new creation man which would not be governed by sin, evil, or suffering because He will overcome them all. As we to must overcome to be fully grown Sons of God.)
Why did God send himself to Earth, where he already was any way because he is everywhere, in the form of his son, and have his son/self tortured to temporary \"death\" when he was still living everywhere and then come back to \"life\" by going to where he had been forever? That didn't happen. It is the most illogical widely accepted concept I have ever heard of. An infinitely powerful being that is not indifferent to suffering would not create the rest of reality from scratch, laws of logic, math, physics, and everything else, and put suffering into the equation, much less his own. That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. [/b]
(It is very sad to see some who claims that they where once saved, and walked with God, to revert back into a state of being, having no confidence in what they had experienced, if what they experienced was truly (salvation) which I doubt (my opinion.) The spirit once regenerated (can not revert back to being unregenerate,) so either you where only convinced in your mind you were saved, but where truly not. Or, you are truly saved and are openly rebelling against God, which I hope is not the case. It’s sad that God freely gives man the ability to receive eternal life, and walk into another realm of life, and because of the arrogance of man not being able to comprehend all the details in his head won’t receive them, because he can’t get his tiny little brain around them.)
I have asked you time and time again to counter my point that an infinitely powerful being who is not indifferent to suffering would not put suffering into his creation. You have not explained it yet. You keep talking this irrational stuff about limiting himself, which I keep explaining would involve indifference to suffering because he WOULD NOT HAVE TO limit himself. I want to believe in this thing you are talking about, but you are not helping me. All of your responses have been beside the point. You have yet to explain how limiting one self to allow suffering when one does not have to is not an act of indifference to suffering. If you are drowning, and I limit myself from saving you when I don't have to, how in the world is that not an act of indifference? [/b]
(And again I have stated over, and over again If God don’t chasten you for your disobedience (from straying from the path of righteousness) then you are a bastard child, and none of His. Suffering is ‘the processes’ which God uses to mature mankind into perfection. As a smith purifies gold in the fire, so also is man to be purified in the fire of sufferings. Just, as Jesus did. And, ‘I know you will come back again and state the same tried dead statements again saying if God is God then He would not have limits on Himself?’ But, He must limit Himself to bring mankind unto perfection. It is an act of love, to grow His Sons into a mature spiritual man. The only problem we have here is you’re inability to accept that God makes mankind suffer for a reason, and you can’t see the reason.)
Also, don't tell me that I have not accepted Jesus as my savior and that's why I don't understand. I did accept Jesus as my savior, when I was 12. I had been a Christian since early childhood, but I decided, when I did not have to, to go through with a formal baptism when I was 12. I fully believed in what I was doing and seeked to do it. I felt feelings that I at the time believed to be the love and holiness of God. I said \"The Lord's Prayer\" and sang \"Come into My Heart\" in my head every single night before I went to sleep. I was a full blown holy roller. I even got ragged by my friends for being so extremely religious. When I was 16, I started really THINKING, and the concept didn't make sense to me any more when I started doing that. Ever since then (I am 33 now.), [/b]
(What you have stated here is true, you have started ‘thinking,’ and you have stopped believing. Just, as Eve did in the Garden. So in that state you are condemned to wrestle with your own mind until death or until you believe by faith again. You’re choice.)
I have tried and tried to get Christians to fully explain to me how the idea makes sense, and it has not happened yet. So I ask you again, please fully explain to me how what you are talking about makes sense, considering the very specific logical disagreements I have with it. Thanks. [/b]
(I have explained it over 10 times now but you still can’t wrap your brain around it, because it is spiritually discerned.)
(Here it is again so pay attention:
God placed man under vanity, (suffering) so that man would grow beyond the natural physical realm, and partake of the spiritual, which he can not attain unless the natural mind is ‘TURNED OFF’ which is what you can not to do in your present state of mind, if you had ever done it before being saved (i.e. applying faith) in His Word.)
(For only His Word through the guidance of the Holy Spirit can teach you the truth of ‘all things.’ Then and only then will you relinquish this perpetual feed-back loop argument.)
The Rev.
|
|
Bookmarks