Einstein's idea of God was the mystery of the universe, I think. |
|
|
|
Last edited by Riot Maker; 02-05-2008 at 08:03 PM.
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
Einstein's idea of God was the mystery of the universe, I think. |
|
A non-dice playing god. |
|
It depends on how you define atheist I suppose. Most people when talking about theism are talking about crazy old bearded men in the sky, so to most people I suppose you're an atheist. |
|
Albert Einstein was a Deist. |
|
hmmm so it was logical to him for a belief in a type of God, interesting. |
|
Last edited by Riot Maker; 02-07-2008 at 05:46 PM.
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
Spinoza believed that all things in the universe were part of a unified whole that was 'Deus sive Natura' or, 'God or Nature'. At first this may seem like an atheistic view, but he definitely saw it as an entity and referred to it as the "one true being" that was capable of thought. The reasoning behind this is that, since we are capable of thought and are also a part of this all encompassing being, it is also capable of thought. |
|
Art
The ability to happily respond to any adversity is the divine.
Dream Journal Shaman Apprentice Chronicles
Thanks for that post it puts things in perspective. I was just going over the encyclopedia of philosophy of him and it says that he was one of, if not the greatest, defenders of monism. |
|
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
Nice thread. =) I find this all very interesting. |
|
Einstein, when someone has no logical anwser they envoke a higher authority. Einstein got many things wrong in his life, most notably Quantum mechanics. |
|
Xaqaria
The planet Earth exhibits all of these properties and therefore can be considered alive and its own single organism by the scientific definition.does the planet Earth reproduce, well no unless you count the moon.7. Reproduction: The ability to produce new organisms.
He also saw it logical that there was no big bang. He never accepted the theory and maintained to his death that there was an antigravity force hiding in his equations to keep the universe static. |
|
Ummmm is it me or Einstein called the cosmological constant the single greatest mistake of his life? |
|
I was talking about spinoza as the greatest defender of monism, but thanks non the less. |
|
Last edited by Riot Maker; 02-08-2008 at 10:32 PM.
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
He was not wrong about that. I am not a physicist, but I am just as certain that the universe is deterministic as I am that London exists. There is no such thing as randomness. Such a phenomenon would necessarily have to, at some level, involve uncaused events. That is a nonsense concept, and I will say it to any physicist in the world. If they believe in randomness, they are wrong. I am positive of it. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
Would you say it to Hawking? |
|
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
|
|
I should be floating, but I'm weighted by thinking
Causality does not equal determinism. You're letting a shiny concept distract you from the world that actually exists. If you want to go into more depth about it, take it up here. |
|
If you have a sense of caring for others, you will manifest a kind of inner strength in spite of your own difficulties and problems. With this strength, your own problems will seem less significant and bothersome to you. By going beyond your own problems and taking care of others, you gain inner strength, self-confidence, courage, and a greater sense of calm.Dalai Lama
I've never seen that picture. Looks like fun. |
|
As I said in the relevant thread, |
|
If you have a sense of caring for others, you will manifest a kind of inner strength in spite of your own difficulties and problems. With this strength, your own problems will seem less significant and bothersome to you. By going beyond your own problems and taking care of others, you gain inner strength, self-confidence, courage, and a greater sense of calm.Dalai Lama
You have said a lot to me about how human minds can be deluded with regards to morals. |
|
Doesn't randomness only come into account if you repeat the "experiment"? In our situation the experiment is the universe. So if the universe doesn't repeat itself, nothing can be random. Once it happens it can't be changed. It's still a clockwork universe in my eyes. I believe in fate, not because of some superstition, but because it's quite obvious to me that I'm not in control, that I have no free will. The same goes for the rest of the universe in my opinion. If I move my hand, I'll never be able to change that, I only have one past. If something is random it only means we don't know what will happen, because we don't know how the universe works. |
|
Bookmarks