Thread: At what point do we stop thinking?

For some reason he keeps changing that video.

Originally Posted by Scatterbrain

For some reason he keeps changing that video.

Huh? lol i'm confused.
By the way, he fails to realize that evolution is falsifiable, its just that the things that would "falsify" proved it instead hehe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNGO7ghd_k

53 seconds in and he is already making misconceptions.

He switched the original video for another with some alterations (didn't see the original so I can't say exactly what was changed at the time), he then switched it again (for the video you now see), the argument appears to be completely changed.

Originally Posted by Scatterbrain

He switched the original video for another with some alterations (didn't see the original so I can't say exactly what was changed at the time), he then switched it again (for the video you now see), the argument appears to be completely changed.

Haha for real? What a jack ass.

Originally Posted by StephenT

At what point is it most efficient to stop thinking, and feel?

I mean, when should we abandon logic and knowledge, and rely on emotions and gut feelings?

Is it when we reach something that we don't know?

If yes, then what do you do when knowledge is found? If it contradict what you felt, it is hard to abandon that belief which you have entrusted to be true, although it is false.

Then, should we ever begin to feel if it will later be refutable?

Life would be a little bit bland, right?

So, what is the point at which we should abandon logic, science, reason, knowledge, and thought, and succumb to feelings, emotions, and beliefs?

When we create art, music, poetry, writing...

Originally Posted by Maestro

When we create art, music, poetry, writing...

? But....art, music, poetry, and writing on all have specific formats.

Art and music have mathematical properties they have to adhere to that most people are able to intuitively scratch at... poetry has set standards on how it "should" be, and writing has some standards as well.

But I get your point.

Originally Posted by Sandform

? But....art, music, poetry, and writing on all have specific formats.

Art and music have mathematical properties they have to adhere to that most people are able to intuitively scratch at... poetry has set standards on how it "should" be, and writing has some standards as well.

But I get your point.

But the whole point of art and music is breaking those boundaries. Had time signatures never been created, I bet music would be a lot more versatile. And you can see that even today. People don't always settle for a strict 3/4 or a strict 4/4. Hell, when I write music, it changes almost every other measure, with things like 7/8, 15/16, 5/8, and so on.