And now it gets interesting.
 Originally Posted by Universal Mind
Okay, here I go again. Choose to sincerely believe for five minutes that you are a billionaire movie star. Then tell us what it was like.
In order for me to establish rather or not I believe I am a billionaire movie star I'm going to have to analysis it based off my life experience and rational thought.
Do I have a billion dollars? No
Am I a Movie Star? No
Now I can make a decision rather or not I'm willing to believe I am a movie star. Based off the fact that I don't have a billion dollars and I am not a movie star I would then choose that myself as a movie star is false and I do not believe that I am a movie star.
See you're asking the wrong question. You can't ask someone to choose to believe in something that they have already categorized.
This is the way the question should be asked and I've asked this in another thread before.
On January 1st 2001 what was your opinion about September 11 2001 and the attacks on the World Trade Center? Did you have any sort of belief or disbelief in 9/11?
 Originally Posted by Bonsay
No Ne-yo...
You formed a belief when you considered the probability of imran being a platypus.
Exactly thats my point. You cannot form a belief or a disbelief for something you're completely oblivious to. It's an Unknown, Unknown. Once you're exposed to something you've never knew of before then you're able to form a belief or not based off how you evaluate the claim that you are now aware of.
 Originally Posted by Bonsay
If choice of belief was possible, then you could choose to believe he was a platypus, even if the probability was astronomically small. You can't do it, therefore you can't choose beliefs.
No, your wrong. If I never heard of it before then it's an unknown, unknown to me. Once he made the claim that he was a purple platypus from Pluto, now I am able to establish rather or not I want to believe it based off evidence, logic, rational thinking etc.. Now that I am exposed to Purple Platypuses living on Pluto I can make a determination on rather or not it's feasible to believe this. I don't see any evidence that supports it, so I made a choice to have a disbelief that Irman was a purple platypus from Pluto.
 Originally Posted by Photolysis
You can't. But equally you can't choose once you're aware of it either, since the way we determine beliefs is predetermined by other factors.
How can you not make a choice once you're aware of it? Predetermined factors are irrelevant. You still make a choice for yourself, predetermined factors can only assist in establishing a choice but it doesn't make it for you if you're completely oblivious to it. A predetermined factor could be true or false in the scope of the unknown to you. If someone else knows of it, it's true or false for them, if you do not know of it, it's an unknown, unknown, and you do not have an opinion one way or the other about it. What's happening at this moment is an opinion of the unknown is pending exposure to be determined upon. Once you're exposed to it, you can then assert your belief or disbelief based off predetermined factors or any other way you want to asses it.If you're simply oblivious to it then, It's an unknown, unknown to you.
 Originally Posted by Photolysis
If I talk about a purple platypus, whether you will believe it or not is already determined by
A) the evidence and reasoning I have for the item in question
It may be already determined but it doesn't matter because it hasn't been determined by me yet. Now that I know of it this is the first set of my awareness or exposure for purple platypuses. Do you think a year ago I had already established an opinion about purple platypuses from Pluto? Did you have a belief or disbelief in wiggy waggies on the surface of Saturn when you were 15 years of age?
 Originally Posted by Photolysis
B) your existing beliefs and the way you determine them
Only after I became aware of purple Platypuses. Before today I simply had no opinion one way or the other about it because it never crossed my mind. Everything in our life that we are not exposed to we are automatically neutral and we have not established a determination for it because we are just simply unaware of it. Someone else may have already been exposed to something and has made determination on how they would categorize such a thing, however if we do not know of it, it doesn't affect us one way or the other until we are exposed to that something.
 Originally Posted by Photolysis
I'm free to present whatever evidence or reasons I want, but your reaction to them and whether they are good enough is already determined. If it were a choice (even if only when you first encountered an idea) you'd be free to arbitrarily switch between beliefs at will.
That's the point it doesn't matter if it's already predetermined in YOUR world, If I'm not exposed to it, then it doesn't affect me one way or the other remember it's about rather "I" would believe or not and I;m completely neutral about it until you expose me to the thought and evidence to support a claim, then at that moment I am able to classify the claim as true ( I would believe) or false ( I would not believe) before then I was completely undecided about it. Actually not trying to get off topic but if you ask me this is the true meaning of "A Lack of Belief"
 Originally Posted by Photolysis
And the only way you can change your reaction to evidence is to be convinced that the existing way you react is flawed, as I said earlier.
I agree with that.
|
|
Bookmarks