You obviously do need a translation because your interpretation was way off. There are supernatural experiences all over this board. Make your own case, since you're the one refuting the existence of the supernatural. |
|
You obviously do need a translation because your interpretation was way off. There are supernatural experiences all over this board. Make your own case, since you're the one refuting the existence of the supernatural. |
|
Last edited by User; 08-05-2009 at 12:47 PM.
above nature? bullshit. Everything is in nature. Nothing exists outside of nature. We're having a semantic argument, that's all. You can't even name one phenomena that you want me to give you criterion for acceptence. You aren't interested in finding truth, you're interested in having what you already think be right. Most of the experiences on this board can be explained by SP and HH. Simple as that. It is not the onus of one refuting something to prove it's non-existence (that's impossible as it would require infinite knowledge you fucking moron) but is the onus of the one who would like it accepted. |
|
Previously PhilosopherStoned
For the record, I think that reincarnation is probable, work on my chakras in my lucid dreams and think that there are fundamental connections between conciousness and physical reality. I am intelligent enough to recognize that there is no way, as of yet, for science to accept these things and that in the meantime, the findings of science trump speculation and personal experience where they do conflict. The Dalai Lama agrees. If there is a scientific explanation for something, accepting it does not make me, or my life, less "special". Therefore, I would not call someone ignorant for not believing in chakras. I would call someone ignorant for not accepting evolution. You are just stupid. You play games with words as if they are synonymous with reality. I'm done with this conversation. |
|
Last edited by PhilosopherStoned; 08-05-2009 at 01:21 PM.
Previously PhilosopherStoned
Bookmarks