 Originally Posted by b12
Can you guys provide a little more information on why you disagree, rather than "No"?
That's a very reasonable response; I'm glad you asked.
But the real question isn't really why we disagree, but why you agree.
Almost all of the claims made in the video have no evidence behind them (the rest of them are simply totally absurd like still believing in Aristotle's 5 elements). Try to prove, or even give an explanation of how you would begin to demonstrate, any of the claims. You can't; they're not falsifiable so therefore they're meaningless. I could just as well claim that there was some 'aether' which permeates all of space and time without interacting with it physically, and which contains 'all of mathematics', and which is therefore responsible for all of physics. There's a famous phrase for this in the philosophy of science: "not even wrong". It's beyond being incorrect: it doesn't even mean anything. There's no way of demonstrating its veracity or otherwise. And what can you actually predict using either my theory, or the theory of 'Sacred Geometry'? Apparently it explains the entire universe, so give a single successful prediction that this theory can be used to make, which was then tested and found to be true. An example of this working is Einstein's theory of space and time called 'general relativity'. This is proper knowledge, because it made solid claims, such as the claim that light would be bent around stars. This was tested and found to be true. General relativity is now essential for the functioning of GPS satellites. Another potent question: which technologies rely on Sacred Geometry?
Although my BS image is ostensibly just biting satire, if you think about it, it actually contains pretty much contains all of the reasons that Sacred Geometry is rubbish. The video claims as evidence the (almost definitely fabricated) assertion that you can somehow see all of the periodic table of elements within this figure. But how do you know that that means that the figure tells you about reality? The only way you knew about the elements in the first place, was not through the epistemological system of Sacred Geometry, but through the epistemological system of the scientific method. For every true statement you can somehow embody in the figure, you can embody a million other totally stupid statements, including patently false statements, and even including the statement that the figure itself is a load of BS. On what basis, for what reason, do you discard these bad statements, and keep the correct ones? Because you already knew they were true. The figure can only be made to show what you already know, which clearly demonstrates that it is meaningless.
|
|
Bookmarks