Quote Originally Posted by Somii View Post
Wayfaerer,

Xei is questioning how one could "define" an object without expressing its essential properties - properties of which an object could not be said to exist without them.
Yes, properties of which are mysteries. Thus, an object of which we have no idea about essentially.

Quote Originally Posted by Somii View Post
Describing a particular object by its relation to other objects, outside its means of existence, would be describing its superficial properties - non-essentials in relation to that particular object. Thus, how could an object be defined by superficial properties not being apart of the object itself?
This makes no sense, objects only have properties because they are in relation to others. Also, Nature is a unity, nothing is outside a superficially isolated objects means of existence. When human knowledge finds a way to express this object's relation to the rest of nature as a more essential object, it doesn't make sense as an object anymore.