http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...ord-in-US.html |
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...ord-in-US.html |
|
(\_ _/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
no, I take it back |
|
(\_ _/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Karma. |
|
pwned. |
|
First of all, the verdict makes me happy--maybe unjustifiably so, but happy nevertheless. However, did anyone actually read the article? Either that article's description of the ruling was completely inaccurate (it wasn't written by a techie, judging by the statement that XML is a "kind of programming language") or the ruling was completely unfounded. According to the article, "The ruling covers all Microsoft Word products that can open XML files or DOCX and DOCM documents." That sounds like the ruling wasn't that Microsoft violated i4i's patent on Microsoft's Office Open XML (.docx and friends) but rather on Extensible Markup Language itself. If I'm reading that correctly, the implications (due to this judge's ignorance) are very, very bad for UNIX, free software as a whole, and even the WWW. |
|
What a shame! Such a good program too. |
|
John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Bookmarks