Hahaha. I define arguing as being more emotionally drive, and debating as being logically driven. In my experience, debate tends to lead to arguments. x_x It usually goes from a logical point vs. another logical point and spirals downward from there as emotions and tension rise. Before long, logic is dead and emotions are driving everything.
When emotions run the show, simply don't buy into the mindset the other person is trying to impose on you. If you accept this illusional position, you are essentially at the other person's mercy, even if they don't realize it. Be a rock and don't let your emotions run your own position.
As long as your negativity is running the show (of your position), no amount of logic will make the other person concede (most of the time). But if you're coming from a place of true security, the other person will notice that. How they react will differ from person to person.
Often debates have some level of emotional drivers. That's why in some forum debates, or maybe even any debate in general, things can get heated, condescending statements are made, posts strike nerves, etc. etc. etc.
Anyway, that's a general summary of a part of my perspective.

Bookmarks