I actually use what you call "static recall" when I do choose to MILD. Recalling the whole dream while repeating your affirmation seems difficult |
|
If you're motivated you are supposed to do MILD properly. Wake up, recall, spot dreamsign if one there, visualise seeing a DS in next dream, repeat an affirmation three millions times before going back to sleep etc. But I've been thinking about what happens if you "fail" MILD - that is, you fall asleep at one of the stages. It leads me to ask the question of what happens if you fall asleep at the recall stage. Is recalling - and recalling, generally - an ideal mental exercise that makes you likely to become lucid in your next dream? Or would something else be better? |
|
My LDing record, if you want to hear about it, is about 4 WILDs, 1 DEILD, and the rest DILDs.
I actually use what you call "static recall" when I do choose to MILD. Recalling the whole dream while repeating your affirmation seems difficult |
|
Thanks TC. |
|
My LDing record, if you want to hear about it, is about 4 WILDs, 1 DEILD, and the rest DILDs.
I've found in recall that placing an emphasis on sensory and emotional details (instead of plot and chronology) has a positive impact on dream vividness and lucid percentage. I think one's attitude should be that you are "investigating" the previous dream, not just retelling the sequence. So I think that at least partially overlaps with your idea of static vs chronological recall. One habit that works for me is to spend more effort on painting the scene: the lighting, the colors, the mood, how did I get there?, is it familiar?, and so on. In chronology, reckoning those details might have been spread over a period of minutes in the dream. But when I recall the scene, I try to collect those details at the beginning to set the scene, and then go on to the plot. |
|
I am sure about illusion. I am not so sure about reality.
Bookmarks