Originally posted by peebrain
This is what happens: *(Now I'm getting to the point ).
\"Although science is not supposed to tolerate vague or double standards, always insist that unconventional phenomena must be judged by a separate, yet ill-defined, set of scientific rules. Do this by declaring that \"extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence\"-- but take care never to define where the \"ordinary\" ends and the \"extraordinary\" begins. This will allow you to manufacture an infinitely receding evidential horizon; i.e., to define \"extraordinary\" evidence as that which lies just out of reach at any point in time.\"
( http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/scepti...ism/drasin.html )
This is EXACTLY what happens to me any time I provide proof for any \"skeptic\". *We all agree before hand what is considered \"proof\", then I do what they tell me to do. *Then after I succeed, they decide that all of the sudden, this thing that was air tight 15 minutes ago, is no longer air tight and isn't worthy of \"proof\".
I'll take the media section on PsiPog.net as another example, which you can see people talking about in this thread. *A long time ago, we didn't have a media section. *\"Skeptics\" would come in and claim that \"if it's so easy, then why don't you make a video of it and post it on your website?\". *We figured - ok, that makes sense. *So we created the media section.
The first video was the one of myself spinning the pinwheel (that you can still download at psipog.net/media.html). *After that video was released, the response was amazing. *All the \"skeptics\" suddenly went from \"post any video\", to \"post a video under a glass\". *They don't recognize they make this jump, they just assume that was the qualifications earlier. *So, what did we do? *Now we have a video of annie spinning a pinwheel under glass. *Now they make the jump \"post a video under glass\" to \"post a video where we can see what's under the table, THEN show it under glass\".
This is what I mean by a \"receding evidential horizon\". *We have consistantly done what others have (rudely) demanded of us, only to have it thrown back in our face. *It's come to a point where we physically can't host a video file of \"proof\", because the list of requirements is so long, the video would be too long to host.
---
Ok... I'm sorry this post is long. *But here's the good news:
We can't prove it to you. *No matter what we do, we can NOT prove it to you. *I'm sure someone will reply to this thread with a list of requirements, and I GUARANTEE you, that if I actually fulfilled all the requirements, they would invent a new test and ignore all evidence I provided with the previous test.
The good news: You can prove it to YOURSELF. *You can learn! *If you do some simple exercises, you can see YOURSELF do something psychic. *And that's the goal of my website. *Proof of something this ground breaking can't come from an external source. *So, I challenge all the \"skeptics\" here: don't trust me. *Practice for a month, and see for yourself.
I made this same challenge to someone named \"Not_Important\". *He called me all sorts of names, and I finally convinced him to practice and prove me wrong. *He has currently written three articles on how to do telekinesis for my website, and has two media files concerning it. *He was just like me... a \"skeptic\" who was hell bent on proving everything wrong. *We never considered that it might actually be true. *Once someone else convinced us to practice, and we saw results with our own eyes, it drove us to get the word out that this shit is actually REAL. *And now we meet the same type of person that we used to be.
Sorry... this is long. *Thanks for reading.
~Sean
This happens to me A LOT. I made the mistake of telling some people about what I was practicing a while back, and they would bother me all day. "Move this!" or "Lift up this book!".
Then the more ignerant ones who had no idea what telekinesis was, would bother me about telekinesis also, but they would yell things like "Send me a message with telekinesis (lolololol )".
So I showed them the psi weel, and I managed to convince two guys that telekinesis is real. I'm teaching them now.
But for the ones who did not except it, they made more and more excuses, like I was blowing the pin weel, or shaking the table, even though they were watching me very carefully.
They asked me to spin it over and over again...
One of the biggest "skeptics" in the group went around telling people I told him I was blowing it...
This is much easier to say then to do, but skeptics, give some slack on people who claim to posses telekinetic powers, its much more different then what media subjects it to be.
But I guess I shouldn't have told these people... bad idea...
They will keep on bothering me, and when I can do something that they could not deney. And when I show them that, know wondering on what they will do... lol
|
|
Bookmarks