Originally Posted by Luanne
That my friend would be you. Cause I expressed my subjective opinion, and explained it once more and you still want to debate. But that's ok, don't get me wrong.
How do you figure? What, because I don't see a problem with debating the points of one's opinion against another person's opinion?
I very deliberately stated my reply to you as being "just my opinion" (more than once, actually). Something you neglected to do. My issue was mostly with the condescension being thrown at the people who liked the movie, which I didn't think was warranted (and still don't). If you disagree, then so be it.
Originally Posted by Luanne
Yes, that would make me a lot happier! But instead of the second part of your sentence, imagine now if Cameron used his creativity instead! Yeah, it's a lot harder. You seem to limit your criteria by the fact that he wanted it to be a mainstream. I can't respect this. When it comes to art, I express what I feel is missing from my own personal satisfaction. If it shoots for the sky, so be it. There are plenty of movies that I truly love and respect as art. Avatar is not one of them.
And that's fine. Truly. Since I believe that film is multi-faceted, and that it takes more than an original story and flowery dialogue to categorize a movie as art, I still disagree with you.
To each, his own.
Originally Posted by Luanne
Yes, exactly! But when did I say that background should be flashed out for idiots? I said it should give us just a glance, it should be mind puzzling. I'm sorry if you still don't get what I mean.
I "got" what you mean, the moment I read it. Just because I disagree doesn't mean I lack understanding. I simply don't agree that all movies have to be mind-puzzling. I don't agree that all characters have to have back-story. It, to me, is not a requirement of good entertainment (or art, necessarily). Yes, if a movie has it, then that's great. I appreciate the attention to detail. But if a villain doesn't even give us a glimpse into his back-story, but does a great job of portraying his persona at present, then it is just as effective, to me. In my opinion, it gives us more to ponder. It leaves more to interpretation.
That Quaritch was drinking a cup of coffee during the final battle; that his arm was on fire as he climbed into his mech, and he calmly looks over and snuffs it out; the serious, overly-dramatic, quintessentially military tone he took during his address to the other soldiers; to me, all of this gives us glances into what kind of man Quaritch is. And I think it's fun to have a bit of mystery behind characters like that.
|
|
Bookmarks