 Originally Posted by buriedmonsters
Exactly, it's MY opinion. Basically everyone you run across will have a reason they are better than you, and who is to say they are wrong? How in the hell are we supposed to classify how valuable people are, we have no unbiased opinions. This brings us back to life needing to be valued simply because it is life.
I don't think so. If a person has a desire to live, they have assigned their own lives value and meaning. If a person has lost that desire, their lives can still have meaning based on the people they interact with. This is why suicide is frowned upon...it impacts the lives of the people the person knows. Let's go to an extreme...let's say there's an old hermit. nobody knows him. Nobody is aware he's alive. If he dies, nobody will care, including himself. In fact, he wants to die. Are you going to deny him that? Does it do any harm? Is his action immoral, just because he's choosing to end a life? Are you protecting life for the sake of life, or for the value it carries?
Well, actually, the central foundation of my argument is that people need to look beyond their own selfish wants and have compassion for other people. If you can't prove or aren't sure (which I am not) when life truly begins, err on the side of compassion. But, whatever.
I value freedom over compassion. The freedom of women to not be forced to carry unwanted fetuses to term.
Nope. You haven't. You are a useless being. You were created out of random events with no love or purpose. So was everyone else. Your brain has evolved enough to develop emotions, and those emotions tell you that you WANT a purpose, a value. But you cannot simply give yourself, or anyone else, a purpose just because you want it. Sorry.
Sure I can. My purpose is to become a pharmacist, live well, be happy, and enjoy life. You can't assert that otherwise. My purpose is my decision. I have the capacity to feel love, compassion, and the full spectrum of emotion. My life has value because I and those around me declare it so. Deal with it.
Yeah yeah. Blah blah. Guess what, you don't have a soul, and I don't think you're as valuable as me...so I can kill you if I want, and then I don't have to listen to you repeat the same inane babble over and over.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the future Hitler. This isn't even relevant. This is a hollow threat that completely fails to address my point, instead defaulting back onto your assertion that souls must exist. Your argument goes something like this:
-why do souls exist?
-because life has meaning
-why does life have meaning?
-because souls exist
-why do souls exist?
.... and so on. You accuse others of using the very circular reasoning you yourself are guilty of. You have absolutely nothing to substantiate your claim that souls exist, and therefore, all arguments pertaining to souls and the existence thereof are null and void. Your position is compromised, your premise shattered, and yet you will cling to them.
|
|
Bookmarks