Originally Posted by Unelias
...
I'll be addressing your post as a whole, so I've omitted the text to save room on the page
Very nicely put. If you spar the way I prefer to, I would love to spar with you some day, I always enjoy sparring with those who I believe to be of higher talent than I. I don't often get the opportunity to, as most aren't.
I enjoyed your words about chi, you seem to have the same view of in as I do. Very advanced for the time, but modern science has taken over. I believe martial arts should not be rooted deeply in tradition, as as knowledge changes, circumstances change, so too should martial arts. Respect for tradition is fine, blindly following it without questioning why, is another.
I've been trained in the technique you called dim mak. The death touch, no? I know how it is performed, but I don't believe it works. I believe it worked once, and legend of it spread and got distorted by word of mouth, as things often do. Theoretically, it could work, a large blow to the chest can cause palpitation of the heart, but you have to hit it at exactly the right time, which would purely come down to luck, and it would not be an instant kill like in the movies, it would lead to a heart attack, nothing mystical about it. Would it work? Yes. Is it pure luck? Yes.
You are right, I don't dedicate myself to martial arts, my full time job makes that impossible. I've been out of training for some time now, only practicing maybe once a week, and I've not taught in a year, although I get called to assist others with seminars from time to time. I've been trying to get back into it, but I keep injuring myself running or lifting.
I too detest masters and organization who capitalize on training for no reason other than to make money. I was once in a style called Soo Bahk Do. I was ready to test for my blackbelt in it, but first I had to write an essay about what the Soo Bahk Do Federation meant to me, and then pay them $500 for just the opportunity to test. I wrote the essay, it was a scathing letter about how the Soo Bahk Do Federation meant to me was a corporate bastardization of martial arts who taught everyone the same way, despite the fact that a 250 pound man needs a very different self defense set from a 90 pound woman. I made my students learn all the karate katas and all of the standard techniques, but I made sure they know well the ones that were relevant to them, and I added additional non-standard techniques from other disciplines as well. I digress, anyway, I sent in the essay (without a check) and immediately quit the do jang. I still have that redbelt somewhere, and I took from the style a few kata that I found useful, and taught them when I taught.
More than fight you, I would love to participate in one of your classes. You understanding of what martial arts is really for seems dead on to me, and I find that rare now a days. MMA dojos seem to be cropping up all over the place now, and I dislike them. Sport is fun, I fought in many MMA tournaments before breaking my thumb in a tae kwon do match. Now I don't have the grip to compete in MMA at a high level, but I occasionally go with students. I dislike MMA specific dojos because they teach people how to aggressively beat other people up, not calmly defend yourself from a self defense situation. I don't think martial arts should be aggressive, only when necessary. In my opinion, the best self defense situation is usually a kick in the crotch or stomach, and running away. I've never seen an MMA guy get mugged, but my assumption is, they would tackle them and try to submit or ground-and-pound them. In the former, a submission is useless, if you armbar a mugger, then what? He's not gonna tap out and walk away, and if you really hurt someone, that's illegal. You can defend yourself, but once the attacker is incapacitated, and you keep going, you become the aggressor.
Anyway, nice sharing my views of martial arts and hearing yours. See you around the forums.
|
|
Bookmarks