Thread: What Would You Do....

That's the thing. Skeptics are supposed to have some sort of rational way of thinking. That's the definition, basically.
To be a feminist and a skeptic is just kind of ridiculous. And to tell guys to not express their innate, genetic desires is telling
them to deny their only real purpose in life. To fuck. She obviously is not a very good skeptic, if she didn't realise the similarities to
catholicism in what she's saying.

Originally Posted by tommo

To be a feminist and a skeptic is just kind of ridiculous.

I hope you either didn't mean it like it reads, or that we disagree on the definition of the word "feminism". Because otherwise I find that statement ridiculous.

Originally Posted by khh

I hope you either didn't mean it like it reads, or that we disagree on the definition of the word "feminism". Because otherwise I find that statement ridiculous.

Feminists are almost entirely anti-male. There are real feminists who fight for equal rights.
I'm all for them and they're clearly not contradicting skeptical values.

Then there are the ones who get all uppity about being asked out and therefore "objectified".
And the ones who say men should ignore their most basic desire.

Originally Posted by tommo

Feminists are almost entirely anti-male. There are real feminists who fight for equal rights.

Almost entirely, eh? You do realize there are male feminists, right?