Here is actually a non-scientific thought to reflect on. (Wich make it unbiased?)

1. Take some chemical toxic waste.
2. Let the toxic waste free in nature.
3. Then take some time to reflect over the combination of statement 1+2..

For anyone who thinks that global warming probably is just another conspiracy theory. I will hereby present four different answears so no one have to scratch their head bloody in confusion with this little example above.

What could be the most likely effect if the combination of statement 1+2 is put togheter. Is it

A: Nothing will happen, because everything looks the same as always.
B: Why should I bother to care?
C: Nothing will happen, because I dont like the words "global warming".
D: The chemical toxic waste will probably most likely effect the natural environment in a negative way in the long run, even if there is science to prove or disaprove the claims of global warming.

Hmmm...