Thread: Unknown ancient(sacred)geometry

I can't help but look at something like this and be amazed by it. But it's a simple, logical design, and that is impressive, but that's about it. Granted I couldn't make my way through all the text. I just don't see it as an explanation to anything.
When I have time (Christmas break) I will honestly give this all a read, because I am interested. I just don't get how this can help us garner any information about anything, other than some constants that we are aware of, and have been aware of for centuries (each from a dozen different sources).
Everything is related, higher dimensions are the key to unifying the four fundamental forces, it just seems that trying to explain anything from this is just as ass-backwards (maybe a leg up) as working from 1=1, and expanding outwards.

Originally Posted by MrBeelzy

I just don't see it as an explanation to anything.

Consider reduction Reductionist Physics. THey are constantly smashing apart particles looking for the smallest possible building block. The problem is, that they keep finding smaller and smaller particles, with no end in sight.

Applying sacred geometry in this context would mean looking for an overall pattern that you could use to explain how they keep breaking down into smaller particles, instead of having to study each one.