Thread: Innately Evil

Originally Posted by Korittke

I'm not entirely sure we've seen the same movies here. Or I missed something.

Morals and principles are of the mind, not of the body. So whether our physical bodies evolved from beasts or not, our minds are nothing like the unaware consciousness of animals.

But it doesn't take removing these instincts to be remain good. It simply takes self-discipline and strong morals and ideals, which sorely lack in our society nowadays.
Apathy is like a plague. Less people are willing to stand up for their morals and principles. Everyone aims towards being tolerant of absolutely everyone and everything that does no harm, etc.

So, truly, even though our body doesn't hold ultimate sway over our mind, it may very well be allowed to do so if we fall into a state of apathy and lack the needed morals and ideals to uphold the goodness inside us. But then we wouldn't turn evil either, for evil is also a conscious effort, when one has strong ideals and ambitions. With apathy taking over, we'll simply degrade to savages.

Originally Posted by Merlock

Morals and principles are of the mind, not of the body. So whether our physical bodies evolved from beasts or not, our minds are nothing like the unaware consciousness of animals.

But it doesn't take removing these instincts to be remain good. It simply takes self-discipline and strong morals and ideals, which sorely lack in our society nowadays.
Apathy is like a plague. Less people are willing to stand up for their morals and principles. Everyone aims towards being tolerant of absolutely everyone and everything that does no harm, etc.

So, truly, even though our body doesn't hold ultimate sway over our mind, it may very well be allowed to do so if we fall into a state of apathy and lack the needed morals and ideals to uphold the goodness inside us. But then we wouldn't turn evil either, for evil is also a conscious effort, when one has strong ideals and ambitions. With apathy taking over, we'll simply degrade to savages.

If the theory of evolution holds true, then everything evolved from other animals. Including our brains. Animals who had these characteristics used them to survive in the wild. The ones who had these characteristics survived, and they passed them on to us.

We can try to keep these instincts under control, yes... but they won't ever disappear. Not until we evolve, that is.

First, the mind isn't the brain.
Second, we don't need to get rid of our instincts. They're what add to who we are. We simply need to upkeep our ideals and principles to have control over our instincts.

thegnome54
Changes in brain function over time are a manifestation of cerebral plasticity. These changes occur as a mechanical effect of the data being input into the system - as you mentioned, a different world (different inputs) would create a different brain.

That being said, I see no reason to separate the brain and "mind". It seems like a false dichotomy, or worse - an invention (what is this 'mind' thing, anyways?). The brain as a biological machine is capable of undergoing all of the changes mentioned, as well as producing emotions and higher thought.

Under my definitions, your question can be rephrased as 'can the brain control the brain'? I suppose the answer would be 'yes', then, although it's very likely that the idea of 'control' is an illusion created by the brain - the brain's mechanical functioning (which results in your actions) is not really the result of conscious decisions, but rather the other way around. (Yes, that means that I believe free will is an illusion)

I don't want to get into a mind vs. the Brain - that's for another thread.

Oh, yes, I'm all for keeping our instincts. Easily exploited. If you can have complete self control over them then you would be good.

Grod

1. James Bond is a hero, for all I know.

2. You're missing the point of what Merlock said.

And for the mind/brain thing... it's a whole different spoon of soup. When Merlock says 'mind' he means the subjective phenomenological experience of existing (qualia). That which remains if you take out certain parts of your brain. That which you can't cut in half.

Also, copy/pasting a post from someone smarter than you isn't cool.

Originally Posted by Korittke

Grod

1. James Bond is a hero, for all I know.

2. You're missing the point of what Merlock said.

And for the mind/brain thing... it's a whole different spoon of soup. When Merlock says 'mind' he means the subjective phenomenological experience of existing (qualia). That which remains if you take out certain parts of your brain. That which you can't cut in half.

Also, copy/pasting a post from someone smarter than you isn't cool.

1. Your attempt to be clever isn't working.

2. No, you are. He clearly referred to the mind as some sort of existence of the brain. I quoted gnome on a post he made. What are you talking about?

I gave him the due credit he made for creating that post. Have you ever used a source before?

What kind of argument is "animals are evil?" The prevailing view is more like animals are innocent.

Regardless, we evolved from social animals, not solitary predators. Our ancestors have very likely been social animals much farther back than the primate phase of our evolution. Love and compassion are our survival instincts. Maintaining social bonds and helping one another are our survival instincts. Most often you see these instincts distorted in individuals who were 'cut off from the pack' in childhood, isolated in a loveless situation, or given distorted models of love.

Yes, bad things happen. We do what we can, as a society, to correct the situation, but we still have a lot of work to do.

Originally Posted by Taosaur

What kind of argument is "animals are evil?" The prevailing view is more like animals are innocent.

I don't know. Who's saying that?

Originally Posted by Taosaur

Regardless, we evolved from social animals, not solitary predators. Our ancestors have very likely been social animals much farther back than the primate phase of our evolution. Love and compassion are our survival instincts. Maintaining social bonds and helping one another are our survival instincts. Most often you see these instincts distorted in individuals who were 'cut off from the pack' in childhood, isolated in a loveless situation, or given distorted models of love.

Yes, bad things happen. We do what we can, as a society, to correct the situation, but we still have a lot of work to do.

Can an animal "love"? Can an animal be compassionate? Animals can't think enough to be "evil" or "good". They are just trying to survive. We get these survival instincts from them. We did evolve from social animals... but this doesn't make us good. Apes and monkeys are aggressive to defend their territory... they used these characteristics and innate traits to be dominant in their group and control. These were passed down to us.

Originally Posted by Grod

I don't know. Who's saying that?


Can an animal "love"? Can an animal be compassionate? Animals can't think enough to be "evil" or "good". They are just trying to survive. We get these survival instincts from them. We did evolve from social animals... but this doesn't make us good. Apes and monkeys are aggressive to defend their territory... they used these characteristics and innate traits to be dominant in their group and control. These were passed down to us.

So you're saying neither humans nor other animals are innately evil?

I was talking about animals other than us, but I think you already knew that.

Bringing this back to lucid dreaming. In another thread, people say that if you have sex in a lucid, it is very much like cheating on your real-life lover. How is the concept of doing other immoral deeds in a lucid dream different?

I'm not saying that humans are or aren't innately evil. I'm not saying that people can't control their selfishness through altruism. I'm saying that when stripped of societal boundaries, people are also stripped of this control (however gradual or fast this may occur, it will occur to some degree). Lucid dream acts such as rape and murder tend to confirm this postulate.

Also, I really like the book Lord of the Flies. <3

From my understanding, human beings are only born with two fears...the fear of falling and the fear of loud noises. Everything else is learned/programmed.

Hello CrimsonWolf.

I think it would be foolish to label yourself naturally evil. Unless you think it's kool or an easy way out of having to make an effort. Before asking why something is evil, first investigate it's psychology. When you understand the psychology of something. It's much less of a mystery and a lot more useful. Then questioning wether it is good or not will not concern you at all.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

Hello CrimsonWolf.

I think it would be foolish to label yourself naturally evil. Unless you think it's kool or an easy way out of having to make an effort.

Lol, I think you're missing the point. I just wanted to know what you all thought.

I think Mystic was using "you" in general, not meaning you in particular.
(This is why I tend to use "one" instead of "you". *cough*)

Merlock correct. CrimsonWolf read more carefully I am not missing a point. You wanted to know what we thought. That's obviously what I think. So what is wrong with you.

Originally Posted by Mystic7

Merlock correct. CrimsonWolf read more carefully I am not missing a point. You wanted to know what we thought. That's obviously what I think. So what is wrong with you.

That was a bit harsh. I just misread the post, give me a bit of breathing space!

In the words of Shakespeare:

"There is no good or bad,
but thinking makes them so."
- Hamlet 2:2

~

Originally Posted by CrimsonWolf

That was a bit harsh. I just misread the post, give me a bit of breathing space!

lol, sorry CrimsonWolf. Patience is thin amongst foolishness and people with monkeys in their avatars. Thank mark75, grod and other friends for the no patience thing.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

I chose no for a few reasons. I think evil is, in itself, a human label. I don't think that there is anything that is objectively evil, and we are simply what we are. The things that we do that can be labelled as "evil" are only "evil" because of how we've come to define the word.

Also, humans are simply byproducts of their environments. A person that is born into a (subjectively) "good" environment is most likely to be a "good" person - to the point were even the thought of doing anything evil is so far beyond the person's scope of reasoning as to render the act itself impossible, without the proper motivation (which is, again, a factor of his/her environment).

I don't think we are born either way.

Very good points. My view is similar.

There are no inherantly good or bad people. We judge a person's goodness and wickedness by their actions, which are decided on by our mental states which are in turn decided by our situations (and some wider infulences). The situations we are in create our actions, which will be the best actions to do in that situation.

Everyone, every single one of us has done and will do good and bad things in their lives. In any situation, we are affected by different levels of desperation (brought on by duress and necessity) and clearness of mind (as well as many, more minor, other factors), and other wider factors such as moral code, upbringing etc. In some situations, the best way to deal with things would be to act in a way that is deemed good. In others, the best or only way to deal with a situation is in a way that is deemed bad.

We don't do bad things because we are inherantly bad - "bad" actions are simply drawn out from us, sometimes willingly and sometmes unwillingly by the situation we're in. Good and bad are labels we've created to build up a happy little naive world of good guys and bad guys and disgiuse the fact that, no matter how "evil" an action is, under extreme circumstances anyone would do it.

Originally Posted by wendylove

I believe we are born with sin, however with the help of Jesus christ we can get rid of sin. So prey to jesus and be born again. You have two choices burn in hell or except jesus and live for ever.

Jesus Christ loves you.

If you ask me, that's just creepy. Who needs a religion that works by coercion?

Most people I've seen who are religious do good things because they're scared of the consequences of not being good, not saying grace, not helping beggars, instead of doing good because they think it's right. What sort of good is that?

I think wendylove was gracing us with a bit of sarcasm

Oh yeah. Only I didn't realise seeing as there are plenty of peoplw here who can say that seriously.

Heh, well, my points still stand.

But anyway, a bit off topic.