 Originally Posted by Mystic7
Universal mind. You have me all wrong. I do debate with you and others seriously at times about things such as this. You may be suprised how much I can apreciate your point of view. I'm the least apathetic about overall corruption. I understand what I can and cannot do about it. What I do and do not know. Like I have told O'nus. This is for me, your responses are to interest me and my learning. Not to win a debate or teach anything about anything. You don't actually think I'm trying to convert you to anything do you? This is just a forum. Serious research is done personally in my own spare time from authors and people I respect. As is serious discussion. That doesn't mean I can't pick up things here and there from people on the forum. But I don't place a lot of importance on what people think or are involved with on this forum in particular. It's not my concern how people choose to live or what to believe. It's just entertainment before I go to work. Besides lucid dreaming is one of my greatest interests. If you care about this sort of stuff, it goes beyond the forum and what you write on it. It's about how you live your life.
P.S
911 is very much symbolic of the processes of mass corruption and how it operates in our society and peoples growing awareness of what is going on. That is why it is so important and key. Also with pictures and other things I post. They have meaning if you could operated less out of your tunnel vision and more in your creative intuitive mind. You would realize there is more going on.
You have left probably about 100 or more posts on 9/11 in this forum, and you talked about it again in your above post. So, what do you think of multiple judicial bribery involving at least one instance of a former U.S. Senate Majority Leader holding a federal judgeship dangling in the face of a judge while that judge decides the Senator's brother-in-law's fate? You have made zero comments on the subject of this thread even though you have left a few posts.
By the way, our former attorney general, Mike Moore, somehow ended up with documented information that lawyer Balducci (one of the Scruggs lawyers arrested for judicial bribery) was supposed to keep secret under attorney client privilege when Mike Moore was prosecuting Balducci's client. Our current attorney general, Jim Hood, was Joey Langston's (other original Scruggs lawyer) roommate when they were in law school at Ole Miss. Are you starting to get the picture here? More to come.
 Originally Posted by R.D.735
I don't find the scandal particularly news-grabbing. In some bygone era, such a scandal would probably be a pretty big story, but the news networks of today could hardly be bothered with such a 'local' news story.
Trent Lott was not a state Senator in the Mississippi legislature when he resigned recently. He was a U.S. Senator in the U.S. Congress. That part is not merely local. Imagine George Bush doing the same thing. Would you consider it an insignificant local story?
 Originally Posted by R.D.735
We've seen this before as well, in a different context. Occasionally, Washington officials, former senators, representatives, military officers, and staff get offered lucrative jobs in the private sector on the strongly-implied condition that they push legislation or earmarks that would be beneficial, or on the promise that they will have even greater influence over the legislative process than they had before. My father happens to work as a contracting specialist for the DoA, and has seen this kind of technically-legal bribe take place.
What you are talking about is questionable and very difficult to prove. Judicial bribery, at least in this case, is not either of those. An individual lost $13.5 million dollars because of a decision that was objectively false. It is hard to argue that legislation that has been debated is objectively false. People have already been arrested by the FBI for what I am talking about. Ed Peters is in the FBI's witness protection program because of his part in it.
|
|
Bookmarks