Thread: The Secret NASA missions.

Discuss

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3

Im gonna watch the first one right now but would you mind summing up all 3 videos into a paragraph? Just to have a condensed explanation on the videos.

Ok i watched the first 10 minutes of the video then i had to go to bed.

From what i saw its just some guy listing his theories and ideas about things with minimal evidence to back them up. Like the one with the astronautes. I guess to get a real good idea of what his points are you need to read the book.

I will try and counter one of his claims that he made in the 10 minutes that i watched the video.

He says because alot of astronautes expereinced some sort of memory loss therefore the government is tampering with their minds and suppressing "the fact" that aliens exist or something of a rather.Basically a baseless conspiracy.

However my explanation for the memory loss for the astronauts is: In Space there is not really a day or night like on Earth. This will cause significant time distortions for humans who can't tell if it's day or night or whatever, (the bodies internal clock starts to go out of whack) and they will get disoriented by the difference that there perceptions may be significantly altered.

I haven't watched it yet, but I feel that I should point out one shouldn't criticize something for being baseless, and attempt to counter it after saying it doesn't support its claims after only watch 10 minutes of an hour long video. It'd make more sense likely if you actually watched it, because it seems that most documentaries make their points first, their theory first, also called the Thesis to get people interested and then support the thesis and argue their point later. Its like an essay on film, it follows a pattern. The first 10 minutes of an hour long video are only going to tell you what the people claim, they'll support it later and give their reasoning later. One shouldn't cry "Baseless" when they haven't even built a base to support themselves on.

My $0.02. I'll be watching these a bit later and give my opinion then.

Originally Posted by ExoByte

I haven't watched it yet, but I feel that I should point out one shouldn't criticize something for being baseless, and attempt to counter it after saying it doesn't support its claims after only watch 10 minutes of an hour long video. It'd make more sense likely if you actually watched it, because it seems that most documentaries make their points first, their theory first, also called the Thesis to get people interested and then support the thesis and argue their point later. Its like an essay on film, it follows a pattern. The first 10 minutes of an hour long video are only going to tell you what the people claim, they'll support it later and give their reasoning later. One shouldn't cry "Baseless" when they haven't even built a base to support themselves on.

My $0.02. I'll be watching these a bit later and give my opinion then.

Good point but atleast i was honest about it right?

that was just my 2 cents to anyhow. Ill watch about 5 more minutes of the video and if it seems interesting maybe i'll watch the rest.

Anyway how do you know the video is organized that way? You say you haven't watched it so why are you jumping tot he conclusion that the first video is were he maks a bunch of claims and the other two are where he explains it?

Was hypothetically speaking.

If it was organized that way, where it very well could be, with another 50 minutes you'd of missed, potentially, a lot of possible evidence or support for their claims.