Quote Originally Posted by ExoByte View Post
I haven't watched it yet, but I feel that I should point out one shouldn't criticize something for being baseless, and attempt to counter it after saying it doesn't support its claims after only watch 10 minutes of an hour long video. It'd make more sense likely if you actually watched it, because it seems that most documentaries make their points first, their theory first, also called the Thesis to get people interested and then support the thesis and argue their point later. Its like an essay on film, it follows a pattern. The first 10 minutes of an hour long video are only going to tell you what the people claim, they'll support it later and give their reasoning later. One shouldn't cry "Baseless" when they haven't even built a base to support themselves on.

My $0.02. I'll be watching these a bit later and give my opinion then.

Good point but atleast i was honest about it right?

that was just my 2 cents to anyhow. Ill watch about 5 more minutes of the video and if it seems interesting maybe i'll watch the rest.

Anyway how do you know the video is organized that way? You say you haven't watched it so why are you jumping tot he conclusion that the first video is were he maks a bunch of claims and the other two are where he explains it?