Thread: Are alien Abductions really happening?

Originally Posted by ranma187

You guys have absolutely no evidence to convince anyone that Alien abductions Do Not happen

There is no evidence that winged pink unicorns do not inhabbit the sea floor... That`s why you have to prove something before it is considered a possibility.

What he said. ^

Originally Posted by ranma187

well i'm gonna need better proof disproving it. i'm not saying i believe they are happening, but i consider it a strong possibilty. And frankly the only mis-proof that you guys can come up with is rhethoric. The sleep paralysis thing is dis proven. because there have been reports of abuctions during the day. As for OBE's does one suddenly have an OBE while their driving in their car in the middle of the day?

We have one scientist anylise an implant and says it's impossible for that implant to have gotten in that person. and he couldn' figure out what it is. Then we have another scientist saying the exact opposite. That doesn't prove or dis prove anything. You guys have absolutely no evidence to convince anyone that Alien abductions Do Not happen, you have only anecdotal evidence that they may not be possible.

1. And I'm going to need more proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is not hiding behind the moon, waiting to zap people into paradise who happen to float by inside of China teapots.

2. Yes. OBE's happen anywhere dude. It is caused mainly by stress, lots of sugar and high blood pressure along with other brain conditions.

3. That's asinine. Saying it is impossible for something to happen yet it happening is a null statement and obviously NOT coming from an intelligent person.

4.

Originally Posted by The golden rule

Wrong until proven right.

I am having flashbacks to the Religion forum. The arguments atheists use when arguing with theists are very often the same arguments general skeptics use when arguing against anything talked about by Art Bell.

The Silver Rule: When a skeptic in a debate mentions the Flying Spaghetti Monster, he or she automatically wins.

YAY!

I /win!

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

I am having flashbacks to the Religion forum. The arguments atheists use when arguing with theists are very often the same arguments general skeptics use when arguing against anything talked about by Art Bell.

The Silver Rule: When a skeptic in a debate mentions the Flying Spaghetti Monster, he or she automatically wins.

Really? I've always thought that using such a cliche, pre-packaged response like the FSM made your argument look weak and anti-intellectual. But maybe that's just me.

Originally Posted by 27

Really? I've always thought that using such a cliche, pre-packaged response like the FSM made your argument look weak and anti-intellectual. But maybe that's just me.

An invincible argument is an immortal one.