Concepts can work without being completely correct. What we do is explain things in a way that works for us. Just because it works doesn't mean it is exact.
If it works that's all that matters for this discussion. That's the point of why I want to use physics because the more effectively it works the better. There is a very good chance the more you understand the more effectively it will work. For this reason understanding is the key and saying something is 'just a concept' will not progress us.


From what we see, we explain things. However, we've developed the ability to see, sight isn't an inherent property of the universe. All we know is that our concepts work. An idea can work based on the wrong foundations if the wrong foundations are based on a true foundation that isn't known...In this way there is no reason to abandon our concepts just because a piece of the concept doesn't make sense to some.
Wait a minute. While that is true if you find something more effective you're not going to cling to the least effective foundation you're going to use the more solid sophisticated understanding as your foundation. You're certainly not going to stop looking for something more improved just because you have something that slightly works. Remember in the other thread how you said you are too lazy. Perhaps that is why you think it's best to just sit on your current understanding without reason to look further into things. My reason is I am not entirely satisfied with the technology within my reach and not satisfied with my current understanding of things so I seek further.

I guess what I'm saying is that dimensions by themselves don't technically exist, but what they represent is technically correct.
They don't exist but they are correct? I see a problem with that something cannot be correct when it doesn't exist haha.