Thread: "Why do I like boys?"

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

Liar. It died of AIDS.

I had said that originally, but then edited it thinking the mods wouldn't like it. lulz

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I had said that originally, but then edited it thinking the mods wouldn't like it. lulz

I know you did.

Once again, this becomes relevant:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzN-uIVkfjg

"Natural" and "Normal" are both stupid words.
It may not be normal, and it may not be natural either. But it IS. So obviously for that one person - It is natural, and it is normal. Things only become unnatural and abnormal when you compare it to the ideal.

On an almost related note, I went to the psychiatrists again. So I might update my old Help! thread.

Also, this is now a pedophile party thread.
But it's infested with boylovers ;_;
Moar girllurvers! Btw I hate those words. "boylover"... "girllover"... "childlover" It's basically the same as when PETA tried to make people call fish "seakittens".

Actually, "natural" would be "that which benefits the reproduction of one's genes". Being gay doesn't help, as men can't reproduce with other men, or women with other women.

But natural or unnatural has no positive of negative connotation. it's not a choice, and nothing in nature is good or bad.

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

Actually, "natural" would be "that which benefits the reproduction of one's genes". Being gay doesn't help, as men can't reproduce with other men, or women with other women.

But natural or unnatural has no positive of negative connotation. it's not a choice, and nothing in nature is good or bad.

I do not see how reproduction is natural. It's only what survives with time.

The only natural is to not exist at all.

Originally Posted by Kromoh

I do not see how reproduction is natural. It's only what survives with time.

The only natural is to not exist at all.

The only real evolutionary imperative is to spread your genes. What you say "to not exist at all" is what life (and its system of evolution) is trying so hard to prevent. It's about "survival of the genes"... not "survival of you". That's the great misconception of evolution.
Sorry :p

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

The only real evolutionary imperative is to spread your genes. What you say "to not exist at all" is what life (and its system of evolution) is trying so hard to prevent. It's about "survival of the genes"... not "survival of you". That's the great misconception of evolution.
Sorry :p

Not really.

Life isn't trying anything. Species who fight for life tend to survive over time, species who don't tend to die. It doesn't mean either one of them is right, or better, or natural. Natural selection is a scheme of logic, not a consciousness with intent - it isn't trying to do anything.

And next time, don't try to prove me wrong with concepts from high school. I know my biology.

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

The only real evolutionary imperative is to spread your genes. What you say "to not exist at all" is what life (and its system of evolution) is trying so hard to prevent. It's about "survival of the genes"... not "survival of you". That's the great misconception of evolution.
Sorry :p

Instead of just saying "not really" I will actually critique what you said. Your initial statement "The only real evolutionary imperative is to spread your genes" Is what I have the biggest problem with. When you are a parent, you may want your kid to have "x" and "y" genes, naturally because it resembles you. If we are talking about natural selection and survival of the fittest, than fundamentally the imperative of evolution is being adapted with the ability to survive. Things that may derive from that include physical strength.. a healthy body, a intelligent mind.

If your wife was a supermodel, but a complete dumb ass, would you find it evolutionary imperative that your son/daughter would inherit her intellect? The complexity theory of evolution with respect to natural selection has it that inheritance of survival instincts would be without doubt the most important. If we didn't inherit those instincts as well as a body suitable for survival, we would cease to survive. If I am being overly analytical you can always link me to your source for your reasoning. That way I could be a little more objective and see where you are coming from

Anyway, about this "being normal" conversation, normal literally means "a lack of significant deviation from the average". The average for human being is to be attracted to the opposite sex, namely heterosexual. That is not to say that your morally at fault, however you do differ from the norm, and that is fact. You may feel apposed to the fact of not being normal, but that is all subjectively psychological. However you are biologically at fault. if everyone was homosexual that would fundamentally be a defect for survival, because we would cease to exist with that rationale. A fireman dying in a fire while having sex with some girl has no relevance to be normal, I don't even know why you used that as a example. What we could have talked about is your fetish for plunging you self the man's harry orifice of death and decay versus the "norm". Bu suit yourself ha ha, be who you want to be.

Originally Posted by Timothy Paradox

Actually, "natural" would be "that which benefits the reproduction of one's genes". Being gay doesn't help, as men can't reproduce with other men, or women with other women.

But natural or unnatural has no positive of negative connotation. it's not a choice, and nothing in nature is good or bad.

Yah yah, you're actually right. Just imagine that I never mentioned "Natural".
Only "Normal."


:U

Originally Posted by Maeni

Also, this is now a pedophile party thread.
But it's infested with boylovers ;_;
Moar girllurvers! Btw I hate those words. "boylover"... "girllover"... "childlover" It's basically the same as when PETA tried to make people call fish "seakittens".

A little boy could kick a little girl's ass anyday. They are also hornier and smell more inticing. They also make a good crowd to rally for your cause, which girls are more reluctuant to do.

So keep your little seakittens away from me. I'm not into that