Thread: a very disgusting side of humans.

Originally Posted by De-lousedInTheComatorium

Kids aren't influenced solely by the parents though.

It doesn't matter.

A) A parent should be aware enough of their child to know if their 11 year old wants to be associated with the word slut.

B) A parent should be trusted and respected enough by their 11 year old so that they can easily explain to a child who thinks they do want to be associated with the word slut that they really don't and all of the reasons why they don't.

C) Even though this is almost never the case, a parent should know more about the family computer than their 11 year old child

D) If a parent knows that their child is the type to do this (which they should if the kid is 11 years old) then they should know enough to restrict their internet use.


If any of these things isn't true it means the parent doesn't pay attention to their child, doesn't communicate with their child and lets the child have unrestricted access to a potentially dangerous medium of communication

Translation = Extremely bad parenting.

Also for those who have said a parent can't know what a child is doing all the time, O and maybe others (didn't read every post). When it comes to an 11 year old child and the vast reaches of the internet, a parent can and should know what their child is doing all of the time.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

It doesn't matter.

A) A parent should be aware enough of their child to know if their 11 year old wants to be associated with the word slut.

B) A parent should be trusted and respected enough by their 11 year old so that they can easily explain to a child who thinks they do want to be associated with the word slut that they really don't and all of the reasons why they don't.

C) Even though this is almost never the case, a parent should know more about the family computer than their 11 year old child

D) If a parent knows that their child is the type to do this (which they should if the kid is 11 years old) then they should know enough to restrict their internet use.


If any of these things isn't true it means the parent doesn't pay attention to their child, doesn't communicate with their child and lets the child have unrestricted access to a potentially dangerous medium of communication

Translation = Extremely bad parenting.

Also for those who have said a parent can't know what a child is doing all the time, O and maybe others (didn't read every post). When it comes to an 11 year old child and the vast reaches of the internet, a parent can and should know what their child is doing all of the time.

I agree totally, that was what I was looking for back when I said that the eleven year old that went there would deserve rape.

That's what I said. What Xaqaria said is what I meant.
I really suck with my words lately

The difference between what I said and what you said is that I realize that at 11, one really can't be held accountable for most of their actions.

It would be the parent that deserves rape, preferably by painful sodomization.

Originally Posted by Maeni

I agree totally, that was what I was looking for back when I said that the eleven year old that went there would deserve rape.

That's what I said. What Xaqaria said is what I meant.
I really suck with my words lately

Yeah, you said that an "eleven year old" deserves rape. Think about that for a second. An "eleven year old."

I say stupid stuff sometimes.
Thats why you hit me with a brick, tell me I'm wrong and then forget about it.
EDIT: Unless I argue, ofcourse, in which case Discussion should be used :V

It would indeed be the parents that deserved rape.

I find it humorous that the very people who argue against pedophilia are the same people who argue for rape. Eventually you'll just turn full circle and end up like those you are criticizing.

Originally Posted by Daniel Danciu

I find it humorous that the very people who argue against pedophilia are the same people who argue for rape. Eventually you'll just turn full circle and end up like those you are criticizing.

If you think anyone here is really arguing for pedophilia or rape, then you haven't been paying much attention.

I'm argueing for pedophilia.


But definetly not for child pornography, child abuse, stalking, whatever.