You're right. Removing the environmental factor doesn't make the cancer go away. But I'm not just talking about removing the original environmental signal. I'm talking about replacing it all together with something entirely different |
|
...I think you missed my point. In explaining how cancer operates, I meant that cells become cancerous when they garner genetic mutations. Things in the environment can cause these mutations, of course. My point was that these mutations are oftentimes irreversible. Skin cancer, one of the most common forms of cancer, comes about when UV light causes a physical change in the structure of thymine within a cell. When the DNA is cloned and the cell divides, there is an error, and the first mutation begins. After that, the cell goes through several more mutations to become a dangerous cancer colony. It isn't just as simple as "activate" and "deactivate." When you remove a carcinogen, it does not cause cancer to go back to normal. |
|
You're right. Removing the environmental factor doesn't make the cancer go away. But I'm not just talking about removing the original environmental signal. I'm talking about replacing it all together with something entirely different |
|
The trouble with sending a signal that says "Stop being cancer!" is that its thought to not work... In the explanations I've heard, one of the major reasons cancer is so dangerous is that it stops responding to outside signals. Maybe it could be fixed by tricking the cell into thinking outside signals are in fact signals from itself? |
|
198.726% of people will not realize that this percentage is impossible given what we are measuring. If you enjoy eating Monterey Jack cheese, put this in your sig and add 3^4i to the percentage listed.
Bookmarks