Thread: Consumerism / Materialism

Originally Posted by Luanne

Explore space.

Misssingg thee pointtttttttttttt

I very much do want to be rich when I'm older. Mainly because I won't have to worry about anything financial, I could help a lot of people and I could live out my fantasies(crazy massive house and flying car)

Originally Posted by Carôusoul

Misssingg thee pointtttttttttttt

I've noticed a pattern of you saying this every time someone uses a simple explanation to show why your position is not necessarily correct. Perhaps you'd like to contribute more substantially?

The point was that through thought experiment we can deduce that the purpose of labour is not the result of labour but rather labour itself.

Not literally 'what would you do if you could do anything'.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

I've noticed a pattern of you saying this every time someone uses a simple explanation to show why your position is not necessarily correct. Perhaps you'd like to contribute more substantially?

Originally Posted by Xei

The point was that through thought experiment we can deduce that the purpose of labour is not the result of labour but rather labour itself.

Not literally 'what would you do if you could do anything'.

Euh, voila.



Whenever i say just that, I figure it's so obvious I don't need to spell it out.

By the way, Carou, have you ever read about the Unabomber, or the Unabomber manifesto?

It's an extremely interesting subject. The manifesto's here:

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Indust...and_Its_Future

Some of it's probably very wrong but a large amount is incredibly perceptive. I'd been working on my own human philosphy for some time and when I saw it spelled out so lucidly I was pretty amazed by how similar my thoughts were.

Search for the paragraphs about 'goals', they're the ones most relevant to this.

Originally Posted by Xei

By the way, Carou, have you ever read about the Unabomber, or the Unabomber manifesto?

It's an extremely interesting subject. The manifesto's here:

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Indust...and_Its_Future

Some of it's probably very wrong but a large amount is incredibly perceptive. I'd been working on my own human philosphy for some time and when I saw it spelled out so lucidly I was pretty amazed by how similar my thoughts were.

Search for the paragraphs about 'goals', they're the ones most relevant to this.

am readan

Originally Posted by Xei

The point was that through thought experiment we can deduce that the purpose of labour is not the result of labour but rather labour itself.

Not literally 'what would you do if you could do anything'.

I understand your point, but I think Luanne's response was a rather simple way to make the point that there are plenty of people who don't need to do meaningless work for someone else in order to validate their own existence. Some people will always find something worthwhile to do, especially if they don't also have to do something meaningless in order to survive. I took you saying "what would you do if you could do anything" as a way to point out that most people given the opportunity wouldn't know what to do and would end up doing nothing, which I don't believe is the case.

Thank you, Xaqaria. You got it.

Xei, I even put a smiley and all... but still you took it as trivializing your opinions on post-scarcity or desire for purpose or whatever (which is really not the topic here). I'll then remind you of my answer in your own thread, but won't discuss it here, cause that would obviously go off-topic.
http://www.dreamviews.com/community/...ad.php?t=85137

Just to be on the safe side this doesn't get misinterpreted again:

A desire for purpose in a meaningless existence; patently so when you get to the ludicrous stage of spending money for the sake of spending it (sports cars, expensive art, etc.).

See, I think this has nothing to do with causative essence of consumerism. 'Spending money for the sake of spending it' is just a phrase that doesn't explain anything.

And once again, I can imagine a world where everything I wanted was provided without me having to work for it, because that would mean more quality life in presence, zen philosophy if you will, which would result in more observing and learning, therefore EXPLORING SPACE.

Sorry, I didn't mean to trivialise it. I'll respond properly in a bit. I'd suggest though that this is exactly what the thread is about; my opinion on the answers to his questions, anyway.

Originally Posted by Carôusoul

Misssingg thee pointtttttttttttt

I'm with Xaqaria on this one, I think its you who missed the point! I agree with Luanne

Well our modern free-market based societies are all based on materialism. It forces us to become and stay materialistic. Surely our societies are modelled after our desires.

And material desire to some extent is nececairy for survival. (House, Food, Cattle, Land, Crops)

The way I see it, is that people just totally lost all perspective and lost themselves in the extremes of materialism. Materialistic desire has gone stampede and turned into obsession.
And having modelled our societies after that compulsive, out of control desire; greed, we now have ended up in a sort of Catch 22 where the system keeps forcing and shaping people to stay in this imbalanced, materialistic state.

Yes we innitially shaped our system, but we became materialistically obsessed and this obsession has made us a slave of our own device. Our system.

The system we people forged from unbalanced minds(Greed, Lust of power, and the resulting ignorant tunnelvision) and now generation after generation is being forged and shaped by this out of control system.

It's like a downward spiral. A circle of destructive behaviour and suffering.
It's mankinds bad habbits that are troublesome to break, because they've become so deeply conditioned into our minds.

If we are to break free from this behaviour we are to go to the core: Our minds. And we are to decondition our minds. Get rid of all these destructive beliefs, thoughts and feelings that are the cause of our destructive behaviour.

Originally Posted by juroara

I'm with Xaqaria on this one, I think its you who missed the point! I agree with Luanne

What luanne said was missing the point that Xei was trying to get across to here. It wasn't relevant to what he was saying. In that sense she missed his point.

Xei's point was about everything being fulfilled, so I would have imagined he meant everywhere explored as well. Because the point was just that everything has been done. It's a hypothetical situation.

Wow... it's like a feeding frenzy in here!!

I'm a little afraid to say anything... somebody might jump all over my case...

But what the hell, here goes anyway ---



My personal solution to the materialist/consumerist merry-go-round most people seem to thrive on:


Rather than get a high-stress job with loads of prestige and money so you can afford a better car and a bigger house, I prefer to live a pretty humble life, making enough to pay the bills plus do what it is I love to do.

Which is stop motion animation. Wait... this is not completely irrelevant. See, the money s just to support the art... (not just hobby.. art). The art feeds the soul. Coming up with stories, and making stuff and filming it etc takes a lot of time and effort... it fills the hours where most people just watch TV or whatever... and gives a sense of direction and purpose. Live for art, do art to live. Prestige doesn't enter into it.

Damn... hope I'm not bleeding into the water anywhere....

Originally Posted by Darkmatters

See, the money s just to support the art... (not just hobby.. art). The art feeds the soul. Coming up with stories, and making stuff and filming it etc takes a lot of time and effort... it fills the hours where most people just watch TV or whatever... and gives a sense of direction and purpose. Live for art, do art to live. Prestige doesn't enter into it.

Yeah, that's exactly what I was saying (when I was evidently trying to impress the troll ); we live in a material world, almost everything requires money. But there is a difference between buying a new mobile phone that has one extra feature which you simply need to have, and buying a piano for the purpose of playing it.

Originally Posted by Luanne

As I wrote that to impress you?! Seriously?

Originally Posted by Luanne

Yeah, that's exactly what I was saying (when I was evidently trying to impress the troll );.

To assume such a thing that would imply I have an interest in you. I assure you, that is not the case. But, to answer your question:

Why don't you believe Idolfan? What is so hard to believe?

I don't believe Idolfan, because people who say they don't love money or possessions are just lying to themselves. You may not literally love money like you love a spouse, but you like to have it in order to acquire possessions that make you feel comfortable. If someone came into your house and stole your possessions you would undoubtedly be pissed off and want them back. Luckily, this void would be filled by more money, and more possessions. If he or anyone else who claims such a thing really didn't care about money or possessions they wouldn't go to school or get a job; they wouldn't have any interests or hobbies (because those generally cost money). Money also buys food and I don't see how anyone could not love food it's basically an instinctive love to ensure survival Since food is dependant on money you essentially love the money that gets you food.