Quote Originally Posted by SKA View Post
I read the debunking 9/11 myth page. And to be honost I'm not impressed.



In fact I find these explanations so weak that it only serves to reinforce my beliefs that 9/11 indeed was an inside job.
They try far too desperately to disporve every single point Zeitgeist made about 9/11. I haven't checked the rest of the pages attempting to debunk Zeitgeist (yet), but you cannot take a documentairy and debunk every single point they make without agreeing with at least some points made in it. It is too complete of a crackdown on Zeitgeist.

Also this guy(s?) uses sources that I do not at all deem trustworthy and objective. Mainstream media channels.
Very sloppy.

The Pentagon video that was supposed to prove it indeed was an airplain was very vague and inconclusive. I must say that whatever struck the pentagon much rather had the speed of a jetfighter or missile than a huge Boeing. It moved far too fast to be visable; Boeings fly relatively slow. Also the size of whatever it was that hit the pentagon looked like at least 1/8th the size of a Boeing. You see the impact took place relatively close to the camera so you would have expected to see a HUGE body slam into it, yet you can only see a very small white stripe.
I suggest you take a good look at that video and you'll see it was NOTHING like a boeing.



And they also claim that large buildings just tend to collapse that way. Is that why you think it is considered such a delicate, expert's job to demolish a building and prevent it from damaging surrounding buildings?
Nonsense. Go ask a demolition expert that demolishes obsolete buildings.




This looks like sanity and realism to you? It looks like a poor cover up job to me.
"Go back to sleep people, everything is under control" is written all over that site.
first, thank you for taking the time to actually read it, many do not.

I guess it may seem desperate to cover them up, but to me it just shows they wanted to be thorough and not leave certain things uncovered.

I did watch the pentagon security cam, and it looked like a plane to me. However, the tapes are too blurry to tell in any event. I dont think 500 mph is too slow for a cam that only refreshes every few seconds to catch, and 500mph is just a cruising speed, I highly doubt the pilot was flying that slow.

I have talked to some demolition experts as well, my friend's step dad is one actually, and he thinks the opposite. So many beams were taken out by the planes that it doesnt seem unreasonable to me to believe they would fall straight down.

It does very much seem like realism to me. more real than, say, half the US's constructional engineers not crying out about how unrealistic the buildings fall was.