Quote Originally Posted by BLUELINE976 View Post
You're forgetting something.

When you assert that "war creates peace," you need to look at both sides of the coin. Sure, applying the statement one side of the equation will give you desirable results, but what about the other side? It's like a mathematical equation.

So when you say "war creates peace," and apply it to the Nazi's, look at the other side. Did the Nazi conquest create peace for the Allied forces? They were in a fairly peaceful state before the conquest. The statement "war creates peace" is false if you apply it to everyone.

Not to mention that peace wasn't exactly created since we replaced their tyranny with our own.

And most agree that if World War I wasn't fought (which is pretty much what lead to the rise of Nazism), there would have been no Nazi conquest (as I stated before, I think). Therefore, it would be more honest to say that peace would've prevented war.
Is that a yes or a no? All I see you doing is morally equating the Allies with the Axis, which is highly inaccurate. Do you know what the Nazis were trying to do? Do you know what they had already done by the time we got to them? I'll put it this way... What they were doing to Europe was much, much further away from your anarchist ideal than what we gave Europe after the war. That is a fact.

World War I happened because Austria declared war on Serbia (because they thought Serbia might have been behind the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand) and Germany sided with Austria and declared war on Russia for preparing themselves in case they had to get involved. Germany and Austria were the problem. Were we supposed to wave a magic wand and make them change their minds or something?

Now please answer the question.

Quote Originally Posted by SpecialInterests View Post
Fighting for peace is like fucking for your virginity.
So is walking to a couch to sit down.

You dodged my question too. Did war stop Nazi conquest? What is your answer?