Thread: Homosexuality, how can it not be considered an abnormality?

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

I am not offended, you simply said you do not understand, however, if you do not understand, I amire your further comments.

My reading comprehension has always been years in advance of my peers. I do not presume a readers depth of ignorance. I speak on my own level, as you do. Now you can either respect me as you respect yourself, or not. You are free to be a rude as you like, and so should I.

It's not very fun to debate when nobody understands what you're trying to say though, is it?

The fun in debate is learning others meaning, not crying that one does not understand or telling someone to shut up. Where did the people here learn their manners from?

Let me add one point about grammar. Any living organism environmental acquisition system can only abstract a things form, or a things material difference. This means that fundamentally one has two, and only two categories of primitive names. We name perceptions.

Thus, in order to do anything with these names we must, as in all craft, learn how to bring together the names of forms and the names of material difference to construct the names of things. i. e. grammar is a craft. A craft that may someday be practiced by those who wish to be civil.

Pardon yet another off-topic post, but I'm calling troll.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

Well fuck you if I am not as free to comment as anyone here.

Insulting the moderators. The people with near total control over what you do here. Nice. Real smart. You're free to comment here, but if it isn't an on-topic post, it's probably going to be regulated/deleted. You may go and create your own thread if you like. You could probably even ask a mod to split this massive slab of off-topic drivel, if you wish. But please, keep this thread on-topic. Your incomprehensible posts, combined with your pompous jackass attitude and strong aversion to posting anything relevant to the thread lead me to think you're a troll. Kindly shape up or leave. We have no use for your kind around here.

And for all those who whine, if you dont see which words belong in which class, and what it entails, instead of enforcing your rude stupidy, try asking a relevant question. Or do you really believe that spreading gibbish and not being able to think is anything but rude?

You're the one spreading gibberish and being rude. Most of us would prefer to stay on-topic without being assaulted by posts only a select few would ever understand without Ph.D. degrees in philosophy and language. You're the one slinging around generalizations and insults (calling us all rude and stupid, eh?), while at the same time posting long strains of nonsense (or what most people would call nonsense, seeing as how you seem utterly incapable of stating your arguments in a language we can understand at some level). Pardon me for not giving a rat's ass about whatever obscure point you seem to be trying (and failing) to convene, but quite frankly, I don't care. Now stop being a troll and either get your own thread or GTFO. And it wouldn't be a bad idea to start making posts in plain English. Despite all your claimed intelligence and philosophical superiority, you can't even state your arguments in a way that makes sense to us peons. Why is that?

And Mr Mod, if someone is lying to themselves and others, can they possibly be complying with the principles of grammar? Can they possibly be on topic? Or have you, in your great and rude wisdome, even considered the matter? Is complying with the conventions of grammar a social act and non-compliance an anti-social act? Or have you once again, given it any thought?

This is the kind of shit I'm talking about. We're discussing if homosexuality is normal or abnormal, not searching for the philosophical meanings behind language and grammar. Again, stop being a troll or gtfo.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

My reading comprehension has always been years in advance of my peers. I do not presume a readers depth of ignorance. I speak on my own level, as you do. Now you can either respect me as you respect yourself, or not. You are free to be a rude as you like, and so should I.

I'm all for intellectual advancement, and I, too, have always been ahead of my class. However, that does not give me license to assume all others of being dumb fucks who can't read, and then tell them so. This is a free country, yes, and you can be as rude as you want, but do it somewhere else. You can voice your opinions all you like, but here, not only won't people listen, but your posts will be deleted. You can still be rude and arrogant, just not here.

Originally Posted by Philosopher8659

The fun in debate is learning others meaning, not crying that one does not understand or telling someone to shut up. Where did the people here learn their manners from?

Better question is where did YOU learn YOUR manners from? Debating is a joy to me. Defiling the English language by posting off-topic nonsense is not. We're telling you to shut up because you refuse to make relevant posts or post in any sort of way that makes sense. For all intents and purposes, you are trolling. Go away, or dumb it down for the rest of us uneducated knuckle-draggers. Capiche?

Let me add one point about grammar. Any living organism environmental acquisition system can only abstract a things form, or a things material difference. This means that fundamentally one has two, and only two categories of primitive names. We name perceptions.

Thus, in order to do anything with these names we must, as in all craft, learn how to bring together the names of forms and the names of material difference to construct the names of things. i. e. grammar is a craft. A craft that may someday be practiced by those who wish to be civil.

Again, this shit does not make sense. Your issue seems to be that language is a loose (and inaccurate) interpretation of reality. It's a system of symbols used to represent reality. This is irrelevant to the topic. You can go make your case in another thread (and attempt to refine your writing skills so people can actually understand what you're getting at). Now, I can call you a troll, a jackass, a pompous jerk, and you know what I'm talking about quite well. I can point to a creature with four legs, a pointed muzzle, and droopy ears and say, "dog," and you'd understand me. Your posts, being the abstract, incomprehensible, irrelevant monstrosities that they are, by contrast, use a different type of language that is highly ineffective at communicating your point. The words are the same, but your meaning is lost in a sea of nonsense. Trying to make heads or tails of your posts is kind of like trying to extract the hidden meaning of a three-hour long civil war story told through the lips of a toothless stroke patient.